Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Netherlands & Poland

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Netherlands	Poland
Consumption	49.05 billion cu m Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Poland	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th.
Consumption > Per capita	2.8 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Poland	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Consumption per capita	2,940.04 cu m Ranked 3rd. 7 times more than Poland	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st.
Imports	35.74 billion cu m Ranked 15th.	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th. 5% more than Netherlands
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	512 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	-8,990 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	95,312 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 11 times more than Poland	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	349,942 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Poland	150,123 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	6.6 Ranked 9th. 16 times more than Poland	0.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	68.8 Ranked 9th. 16 times more than Poland	4.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	2.56 Ranked 9th. 16 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	4.23 Ranked 11th. 37 times more than Poland	0.115 Ranked 42nd.
Proved reserves	1.23 trillion cu m Ranked 22nd. 13 times more than Poland	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th.
Reserves	1.69 trillion cubic feet Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Poland	154.4 billion cubic feet Ranked 31st.
Reserves per capita	103,738.58 cubic feet Ranked 14th. 26 times more than Poland	4,045.54 cubic feet Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	5.84 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 25 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	32,017 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Poland	7,618 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.834 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 43% more than Poland	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita	114.65 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 9th. 24 times more than Poland	4.77 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	166,171 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Poland	78,027 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	10.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Poland	2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	2.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Poland	0.671 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	35,067 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 37% more than Poland	25,600 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers	1,871 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 10 times more than Poland	182 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	158,613 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 61% more than Poland	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	114,293 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 22% more than Poland	93,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Exports	1.74 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 1043 times more than Poland	1,667 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	100.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	536,864 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 8 times more than Poland	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	32.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 20 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	100.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	46.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Poland	10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	2.62 million Terajoules Ranked 10th. 14 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	923,153 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Poland	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	56.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Proved > Reserves	1.42 trillion cu m Ranked 24th. 9 times more than Poland	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	13,616 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 63% more than Netherlands
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	2.67 Ranked 8th. 8 times more than Poland	0.346 Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	43.5 Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Poland	13.2 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	4.2 Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Poland	1.3 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	10.18 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Poland	2.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	8,547.8 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 271 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	32.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	2.56 Ranked 9th. 16 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Proved reserves per capita	73,192.34 cu m Ranked 19th. 31 times more than Poland	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	21.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	46.86 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Poland	10.44 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	61.9 Ranked 9th. 16 times more than Poland	3.9 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	33.51 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 11th.	-233.755 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.834 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 43% more than Poland	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	1.96 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 10 times more than Poland	0.2 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	9.72 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Poland	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	106.55 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 2440 times more than Poland	0.0437 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	100.69 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	56.57 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	85,222.17 cu m Ranked 19th. 20 times more than Poland	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	3 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 39 times more than Poland	0.0767 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Imports per capita	1,488.17 cu m Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Poland	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	1.62 Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	9.72 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Poland	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	524,595 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 11 times more than Poland	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	5.84 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 25 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	2.15 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Poland	0.671 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	7 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Poland	2.46 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	100.69 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	160.47 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 34 times more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	160.39 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 34 times more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	2.4 Ranked 8th. 8 times more than Poland	0.312 Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	40.17 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	39.1 Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Poland	11.9 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	24 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	8,431 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 351 times more than Netherlands
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	4.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Poland	0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	68,955 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 95% more than Poland	35,420 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	16.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	655,612 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Poland	229,354 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	40.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	267,541 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Poland	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Poland	2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	8,547.81 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 1st. 271 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	12,269 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	13,647 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 11% more than Netherlands
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	139,499 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 116 times more than Poland	1,204 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.752 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Poland	0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	32.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	1.64 million Terajoules Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Imports	764,779 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 92% more than Poland	398,547 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	106.56 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 2422 times more than Poland	0.044 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	1.64 million Terajoules Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	2.62 million Terajoules Ranked 13th. 14 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	3,003.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 39 times more than Poland	76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Total resources	49.01 million Terajoules Ranked 23th. 17 times more than Poland	2.93 million Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-946,710,382,404.685 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 49th. 36 times more than Poland	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	1.62 Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000	0.115 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 24 times more than Poland	0.00477 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	32.9 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 20 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	3.8 Ranked 11th. 37 times more than Poland	0.102 Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	33.49 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	-233.741 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.752 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Poland	0.358 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	1.47 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	220.91 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 150 times more than Netherlands
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	21.44 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	4.23 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Poland	0.928 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	16.39 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Netherlands and Poland in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Netherlands & Poland

Definitions

Citation

Compare Netherlands and Poland in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Netherlands and Poland in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation