Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Poland & United States

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Poland	United States
Consumption	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th.	689.9 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 48 times more than Poland
Consumption > Per capita	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.	2.17 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland
Consumption per capita	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st.	2,107.76 cu m Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Poland
Imports	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th.	88.77 billion cu m Ranked 2nd. 2 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	1.91 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 213 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.	6.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 27 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by households	150,123 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	5.22 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 35 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	1.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 2 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	7,618 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	1.21 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 158 times more than Poland
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	0.4 Ranked 45th.	51.4 Ranked 2nd. 129 times more than Poland
Production > Billion cubic metres	4.4 Ranked 45th.	542.9 Ranked 2nd. 123 times more than Poland
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.16 Ranked 45th.	20.17 Ranked 2nd. 126 times more than Poland
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.115 Ranked 42nd.	1.85 Ranked 17th. 16 times more than Poland
Proved reserves	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th.	9.46 trillion cu m Ranked 5th. 103 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	78,027 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	3.32 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 42 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd.	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	287.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 18th.	2,223.49 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th. 8 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	10,962 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	659,066 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 60 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.671 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.	2.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	25,600 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	741,444 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 29 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	2.77 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 28 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	93,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	688,166 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Exports	1,667 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	776,615 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 466 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	80.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th.	7.19 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 113 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th.	24.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 14 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	80.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	23.95 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 42 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Gross > Production	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	25.17 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 139 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th.	-640,962,665,277.601 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 42nd. 25 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	430,902 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 19 times more than Poland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	13.2 Ranked 36th.	646.7 Ranked 1st. 49 times more than Poland
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.3 Ranked 36th.	62.4 Ranked 1st. 48 times more than Poland
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.102 Ranked 42nd.	1.67 Ranked 17th. 16 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	11.22 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	287.22 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	2,230.22 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 8 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th.	24.35 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 19 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.	17.6 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	10.44 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	15.88 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 52% more than Poland
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	3.9 Ranked 45th.	488.6 Ranked 2nd. 125 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-233.755 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th.	178.35 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	-8,990 Terajoules Ranked 16th.	46,357 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	1.46 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.2 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	4.08 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 20 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	9.39 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	0.0437 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	2.63 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 60 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.	81.05 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	48.43 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Poland
Proved > Reserves per capita	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th.	22,397.07 cu m Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0767 Terajoules Ranked 67th.	0.775 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 10 times more than Poland
Imports per capita	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd.	345.86 cu m Ranked 28th. 33% more than Poland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.49 Ranked 36th.	24.05 Ranked 1st. 49 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.	9.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th.	7.19 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 145 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	6.48 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 27 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.671 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	2.51 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	287.22 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	2,230.22 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 8 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	2.46 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 6% more than United States	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	186.56 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	2,919.98 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 16 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.	81.05 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	85.16 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 18 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	67.58 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 14 times more than Poland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.312 Ranked 46th.	1.99 Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	28.88 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Poland
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	11.9 Ranked 36th.	582 Ranked 1st. 49 times more than Poland
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.16 Ranked 45th.	20.17 Ranked 2nd. 126 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	8,431 Terajoules Ranked 5th.	-65,919 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	6.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	35,420 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	1.95 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 55 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.	17.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	229,354 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	8.53 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 37 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	28.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	5.12 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 40 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 6% more than United States	2.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	287.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th.	2,223.49 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th. 8 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	10,962 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	659,066 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 60 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	13,647 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	57,508 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 74% more than United States	0.206 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th.	24.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 19 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	23.95 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 42 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Imports	398,547 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	4.69 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 12 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	7,120 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	786,624 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 110 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	0.044 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.	2.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 60 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.	15.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 52% more than Poland
Including LNG > Net > Production	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	19.97 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 111 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Net inland availability	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	14.31 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 39 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.	48.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.	772.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th. 10 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Total resources	2.93 million Terajoules Ranked 58th.	228.9 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 78 times more than Poland
Proved > Reserves	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th.	6.93 trillion cu m Ranked 6th. 42 times more than Poland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.346 Ranked 46th.	2.21 Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Poland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.49 Ranked 36th.	24.05 Ranked 1st. 49 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th.	24.35 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 15 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.358 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 74% more than United States	0.206 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	-233.741 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	178.35 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Proved reserves per capita	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd.	30,132.45 cu m Ranked 28th. 13 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	220.91 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	-223.064 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	17.66 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.928 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	6.59 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 7 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th.	17.32 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Poland

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Poland and United States in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Poland & United States

Definitions

Citation

Compare Poland and United States in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Poland and United States in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation