Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Russia & Sweden

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Russia	Sweden
Consumption	460 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 355 times more than Sweden	1.3 billion cu m Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Per capita	4.31 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 39 times more than Sweden	111,393 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.
Consumption per capita	3,097.74 cu m Ranked 2nd. 23 times more than Sweden	132.17 cu m Ranked 46th.
Imports	32.5 billion cu m Ranked 17th. 29 times more than Sweden	1.13 billion cu m Ranked 33th.
Imports per capita	247.34 cu m Ranked 33th. 87% more than Sweden	132.17 cu m Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	112,222 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 28 times more than Sweden	3,944 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.784 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 79% more than Sweden	0.437 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	1.77 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 834 times more than Sweden	2,127 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	4.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Sweden	1.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	6.67 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 725 times more than Sweden	9,193 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	113.63 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 26 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	34.65 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 14 times more than Sweden	2.53 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	334,084.8 cu m Ranked 8th.	0.0 Ranked 122nd.
Proved reserves	47.8 trillion cu m Ranked 1st.	0.0 Ranked 130th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	10,998.56 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 139 times more than Sweden	79.18 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	113.63 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 26 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	2.52 Ranked 6th. 32 times more than Sweden	0.0778 Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	13.87 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 17 times more than Sweden	0.801 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	361.8 Ranked 2nd. 517 times more than Sweden	0.7 Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2004 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.784 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 79% more than Sweden	0.437 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	3.42 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 489 times more than Sweden	0.007 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	489,555 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 7771 times more than Sweden	63 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	9.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 6 times more than Sweden	1.65 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.98 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 274 times more than Sweden	7,234 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	13.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 17 times more than Sweden	0.802 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	1.4 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 94 times more than Sweden	14,893 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	11,001.36 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 1st. 139 times more than Sweden	79.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	1.57 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 2202 times more than Sweden	715 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 24 times more than Sweden	0.024 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	84,673 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 387 times more than Sweden	219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	178.57 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th. 56% more than Sweden	114.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	2.91 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 2201 times more than Sweden	1,321 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	25,556 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 25 times more than Sweden	1,030 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	20.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 1st. 139 times more than Sweden	0.146 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	46.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 46 times more than Sweden	1.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 78th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	113.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 26 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	9.58 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 892 times more than Sweden	10,733 Terajoules Ranked 83th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	66.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 56 times more than Sweden	1.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	113.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 26 times more than Sweden	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	16.27 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 415 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Including LNG > Imports	288,486 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 7 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	16.27 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 415 times more than Sweden	39,199 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Proved > Reserves	47.57 trillion cu m Ranked 1st.	0.0 Ranked 128th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	663,333 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 526 times more than Sweden	1,261 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	402.1 Ranked 2nd. 503 times more than Sweden	0.8 Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	38.8 Ranked 2nd. 388 times more than Sweden	0.1 Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.29 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Sweden	0.452 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	10,998.56 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 139 times more than Sweden	79.18 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	570.11 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 24 times more than Sweden	24.25 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	178.53 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 57% more than Sweden	114.07 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	46.58 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 46 times more than Sweden	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 77th.
Proved reserves per capita	335,437.46 cu m Ranked 8th.	0.0 Ranked 130th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	12.4 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 53 times more than Sweden	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	3.42 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 490 times more than Sweden	0.00698 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	9.79 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 6 times more than Sweden	1.65 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	4.63 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 33 times more than Sweden	0.14 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	4.37 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Sweden	1.07 Terajoules Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	4.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 33 times more than Sweden	0.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	184,872 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 45 times more than Sweden	4,077 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Sweden	0.452 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	11,001.36 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 1st. 139 times more than Sweden	79.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	1.57 million Terajoules Ranked 1st. 2202 times more than Sweden	715 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	625,555 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 65 times more than Sweden	9,688 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th.	4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th. 2 times more than Russia
Including LNG > Net inland availability	4.96 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 217 times more than Sweden	22,842 Terajoules Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	34.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 14 times more than Sweden	2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-1,514,221,347.642 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 31st.	616.24 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 8th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	2.8 Ranked 6th. 31 times more than Sweden	0.089 Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	66.89 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 56 times more than Sweden	1.19 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	12.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 53 times more than Sweden	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	20.31 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 139 times more than Sweden	0.146 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	2.02 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	4.34 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Russia

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Russia and Sweden in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Russia & Sweden

Definitions

Citation

Compare Russia and Sweden in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Russia and Sweden in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation