×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Equatorial Guinea & United Kingdom

Definitions

STAT Equatorial Guinea United Kingdom HISTORY
Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$ $3.50 billion
Ranked 68th.
$2.04 trillion
Ranked 5th. 584 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 6
Ranked 154th. 50% more than United Kingdom
4
Ranked 174th.
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 19
Ranked 44th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
5
Ranked 148th.
CO2 Emissions per 1000 1.26
Ranked 99th.
9.37
Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Equatorial Guinea
CO2 emissions > Kt 164.84 kt
Ranked 183th.
558,461 kt
Ranked 8th. 3388 times more than Equatorial Guinea

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 0.29 kt
Ranked 156th.
9.38 kt
Ranked 31st. 32 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 6.72
Ranked 51st.
7.93
Ranked 39th. 18% more than Equatorial Guinea

Current issues tap water is not potable; deforestation continues to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (has met Kyoto Protocol target of a 12.5% reduction from 1990 levels and intends to meet the legally binding target and move toward a domestic goal of a 20% cut in emissions by 2010); by 2005 the government reduced the amount of industrial and commercial waste disposed of in landfill sites to 85% of 1998 levels and recycled or composted at least 25% of household waste, increasing to 33% by 2015
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 7.46
Ranked 51st.
8.84
Ranked 39th. 18% more than Equatorial Guinea

Endangered species > Bird species 5
Ranked 139th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
2
Ranked 172nd.

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 18
Ranked 44th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
5
Ranked 139th.
Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 32.41 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 20th. 69 times more than United Kingdom
0.472 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 163th.

Proportion of land area under protection 20.61%
Ranked 66th.
27.91%
Ranked 36th. 35% more than Equatorial Guinea

Total renewable water resources 26 cu km
Ranked 8th.
160.6 cu km
Ranked 7th. 6 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 50.94
Ranked 194th.
100
Ranked 14th. 96% more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$ per capita $4,881.96
Ranked 20th.
$33,876.64
Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Total renewable water resources per million 48.64 cu km
Ranked 1st. 18 times more than United Kingdom
2.67 cu km
Ranked 18th.
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 29
Ranked 72nd.
43
Ranked 45th. 48% more than Equatorial Guinea
Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 4,679.09
Ranked 120th.
493,504.86
Ranked 11th. 105 times more than Equatorial Guinea

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 0.343 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 157th.
9.37 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th. 27 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 13
Ranked 116th.
34
Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Water > Percent of water resources used 0.0669%
Ranked 136th.
8.84%
Ranked 55th. 132 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 63
Ranked 38th. 5 times more than United Kingdom
14
Ranked 79th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 6.72
Ranked 51st.
7.93
Ranked 39th. 18% more than Equatorial Guinea

Forest area > Sq. km 16,320 km²
Ranked 111th.
28,450 km²
Ranked 90th. 74% more than Equatorial Guinea

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.48
Ranked 87th. 2 times more than United Kingdom
$0.21
Ranked 165th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 88.91
Ranked 100th.
100
Ranked 18th. 12% more than Equatorial Guinea

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 4,792.51
Ranked 111th.
539,175.92
Ranked 9th. 113 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 41.63
Ranked 189th.
100
Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 68
Ranked 42nd. 5 times more than United Kingdom
15
Ranked 91st.
Threatened species 21
Ranked 89th. 24% more than United Kingdom
17
Ranked 104th.
Adjusted net national income > Current US$ per capita $7,961.98
Ranked 46th.
$33,451.41
Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Biodiversity > Number 1.5
Ranked 101st.
3.55
Ranked 65th. 2 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted net national income > Current US$ $5.70 billion
Ranked 121st.
$2.10 trillion
Ranked 7th. 368 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 1.5
Ranked 106th.
3.55
Ranked 66th. 2 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.93
Ranked 56th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
$0.31
Ranked 155th.

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources > Total > Billion cubic meters 26
Ranked 95th.
145
Ranked 46th. 6 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita > Cubic meters 39,441.93
Ranked 18th. 17 times more than United Kingdom
2,361.3
Ranked 92nd.

Pollution > PM10, country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 5.86
Ranked 180th.
12.78
Ranked 163th. 2 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 13
Ranked 141st.
778
Ranked 27th. 60 times more than Equatorial Guinea
CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 PPP $ of GDP 0.02 kg/PPP$
Ranked 164th.
0.34 kg/PPP$
Ranked 77th. 17 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Proportion of land and marine area under protection 15.09%
Ranked 84th.
23.37%
Ranked 44th. 55% more than Equatorial Guinea

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 2.29
Ranked 40th. 40 times more than United Kingdom
0.0578
Ranked 154th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 86.82%
Ranked 88th.
100%
Ranked 17th. 15% more than Equatorial Guinea

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 65.55
Ranked 201st.
100
Ranked 20th. 53% more than Equatorial Guinea

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 27.04 km²
Ranked 23th. 57 times more than United Kingdom
0.472 km²
Ranked 161st.

Threatened species > Mammal 12
Ranked 66th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
4
Ranked 136th.
Known mammal species 184
Ranked 49th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
50
Ranked 134th.
Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Total > Billion cubic meters 0.11
Ranked 123th.
9.54
Ranked 46th. 87 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 177
Ranked 152nd.
147,199
Ranked 6th. 832 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.874
Ranked 119th.
2.81
Ranked 58th. 3 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 3,032.61
Ranked 82nd.
194,251.99
Ranked 7th. 64 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 153th.
117,677.7
Ranked 16th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 4.36
Ranked 15th. 40% more than United Kingdom
3.12
Ranked 21st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 153th.
1.89
Ranked 32nd.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 4
Ranked 98th.
149
Ranked 7th. 37 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 92.18
Ranked 94th.
100
Ranked 19th. 8% more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $2.46 billion
Ranked 78th.
$368.16 billion
Ranked 6th. 150 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 2.79%
Ranked 90th.
16.61%
Ranked 35th. 6 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Including particulate emission damage > Current US$ $-4,563,109,627.42
Ranked 111th.
$105.29 billion
Ranked 10th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 0.352
Ranked 110th.
2.51
Ranked 26th. 7 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Emissions > PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 8
Ranked 171st.
15.49
Ranked 154th. 94% more than Equatorial Guinea

Known mammal species per million 333.7
Ranked 3rd. 396 times more than United Kingdom
0.843
Ranked 141st.
Areas under protection per million 0.0
Ranked 144th.
9.72
Ranked 45th.
Areas under protection 0.0
Ranked 145th.
579
Ranked 18th.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ $8.81 billion
Ranked 41st.
$57.72 billion
Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Known breeding bird species per million 311.93
Ranked 6th. 81 times more than United Kingdom
3.86
Ranked 131st.
PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 12.49 mcg/m³
Ranked 172nd.
15.06 mcg/m³
Ranked 169th. 21% more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Including particulate emission damage > % of GNI -38.45%
Ranked 117th.
3.9%
Ranked 78th.

Oil rents > % of GDP 41.05%
Ranked 8th. 34 times more than United Kingdom
1.23%
Ranked 50th.

Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Industry > % of total freshwater withdrawal 15.7%
Ranked 45th.
75.37%
Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Forest area > % of land area 58.18% of land area
Ranked 26th. 5 times more than United Kingdom
11.76% of land area
Ranked 142nd.

Organic water pollutant > BOD emissions > Kg per day per worker 0.16 kg per day per worker
Ranked 70th. 33% more than United Kingdom
0.12 kg per day per worker
Ranked 31st.

Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Domestic > % of total freshwater withdrawal 83%
Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than United Kingdom
21.7%
Ranked 48th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 74.24%
Ranked 2nd. 35 times more than United Kingdom
2.14%
Ranked 49th.

Water pollution > Clay and glass industry > % of total BOD emissions 0.6%
Ranked 6th. 2 times more than United Kingdom
0.26%
Ranked 18th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Excluding particulate emission damage > Current US$ $-4,563,109,627.42
Ranked 115th.
$105.39 billion
Ranked 10th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 86.82
Ranked 88th.
100
Ranked 17th. 15% more than Equatorial Guinea

Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Total > % of internal resources 0.42%
Ranked 139th.
6.58%
Ranked 74th. 16 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 143th.
$99.83 million
Ranked 55th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 112th.
0.0
Ranked 126th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 106th.
0.0
Ranked 121st.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Excluding particulate emission damage > % of GNI -38.45%
Ranked 121st.
3.91%
Ranked 81st.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 98th.
0.0
Ranked 113th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 153th.
23.85%
Ranked 46th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 608.72
Ranked 161st.
174,897.57
Ranked 17th. 287 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 64.81%
Ranked 12th. 65% more than United Kingdom
39.36%
Ranked 29th.

Water pollution > Food industry > % of total BOD emissions 65.23%
Ranked 19th. 107 times more than United Kingdom
0.61%
Ranked 33th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 13.01%
Ranked 191st.
35.44%
Ranked 157th. 3 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Agriculture > % of total freshwater withdrawal 0.92%
Ranked 129th.
2.94%
Ranked 131st. 3 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Water pollution > Wood industry > % of total BOD emissions 23.18%
Ranked 1st. 6 times more than United Kingdom
4%
Ranked 9th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net national savings > % of GNI 35.05%
Ranked 10th. 30 times more than United Kingdom
1.15%
Ranked 108th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per PPP $ of GDP $0.24
Ranked 99th.
$0.25
Ranked 96th. 4% more than Equatorial Guinea

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2005 PPP $ of GDP $0.26
Ranked 98th. The same as United Kingdom
$0.26
Ranked 99th.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 41.39%
Ranked 12th. 27 times more than United Kingdom
1.53%
Ranked 110th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net national savings > Current US$ $4.16 billion
Ranked 57th.
$31.06 billion
Ranked 29th. 7 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Water pollution > Chemical industry > % of total BOD emissions 4.22%
Ranked 83th.
17.52%
Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 153th.
0.0
Ranked 156th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 139th.
0.0
Ranked 155th.

Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$, % of GDP 20.8%
Ranked 82nd.
88.86%
Ranked 29th. 4 times more than Equatorial Guinea
International agreements > Signed but not ratified none of the selected agreements none of the selected agreements
Adjusted net national income > Current US$, % of GDP 33.92%
Ranked 152nd.
85.86%
Ranked 54th. 3 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Gross savings > % of GNI 55.8%
Ranked 7th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
14.8%
Ranked 97th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.41%
Ranked 58th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
0.16%
Ranked 139th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 20.75%
Ranked 1st. 52% more than United Kingdom
13.65%
Ranked 28th.

Known breeding bird species 172
Ranked 98th.
229
Ranked 58th. 33% more than Equatorial Guinea
Water pollution > Paper and pulp industry > % of total BOD emissions 4.51%
Ranked 95th.
48.03%
Ranked 2nd. 11 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 2.57%
Ranked 71st.
18.21%
Ranked 28th. 7 times more than Equatorial Guinea

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.22% of GNI
Ranked 148th. 22% more than United Kingdom
0.18% of GNI
Ranked 141st.

Water pollution > Textile industry > % of total BOD emissions 1.33%
Ranked 108th.
5.24%
Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Equatorial Guinea

CO2 Emissions 715.9
Ranked 141st.
558,225
Ranked 7th. 780 times more than Equatorial Guinea
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 5.14%
Ranked 31st. 13% more than United Kingdom
4.56%
Ranked 38th.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 18.45%
Ranked 53th.
22.35%
Ranked 37th. 21% more than Equatorial Guinea

SOURCES: The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; All CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 18 December 2008; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; All CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 18 December 2008. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations World Statistics Pocketbook and Statistical Yearbook; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; Food and Agriculture Organisation, AQUASTAT data.; World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Jacaranda Atlas; World Resources Institute; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates. The conceptual underpinnings of the savings measure appear in Hamilton and Clemens' ""Genuine Savings Rates in Developing Countries"" (1999).; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Kiren Dev Pandey, David Wheeler, Bart Ostro, Uwe Deichmann, Kirk Hamilton, and Katherine Bolt. ""Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations in Residential and Pollution Hotspot Areas of World Cities: New Estimates Based on the Global Model of Ambient Particulates (GMAPS),"" World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department (2006).; World Resources Institute. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; Kiran D. Pandey and others' ""The Human Costs of Air Pollution: New Estimates for Developing Countries"" (2006).; World Bank staff estimates.; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. GDP figures sourced from World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files.; World Bank national accounts data files.; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×