×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Mauritius & Sao Tome and Principe

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe HISTORY
Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$ $6.44 billion
Ranked 60th. 65 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
$99.53 million
Ranked 167th.
Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$ per capita $5,005.13
Ranked 17th. 8 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
$643.73
Ranked 118th.
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 11
Ranked 114th.
13
Ranked 94th. 18% more than Mauritius
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 15
Ranked 132nd. 15% more than Sao Tome and Principe
13
Ranked 139th.
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 7
Ranked 125th. 40% more than Sao Tome and Principe
5
Ranked 147th.
CO2 Emissions per 1000 2.29
Ranked 80th. 3 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.678
Ranked 122nd.
CO2 emissions > Kt 3,142.85 kt
Ranked 122nd. 34 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
91.57 kt
Ranked 191st.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 2.57 kt
Ranked 93th. 4 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.621 kt
Ranked 140th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 3.21
Ranked 95th. 6 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.556
Ranked 152nd.

Current issues water pollution, degradation of coral reefs deforestation; soil erosion and exhaustion
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 3.08
Ranked 90th. 4 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.81
Ranked 135th.

Endangered species > Bird species 11
Ranked 86th. 10% more than Sao Tome and Principe
10
Ranked 91st.

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 6
Ranked 125th. 20% more than Sao Tome and Principe
5
Ranked 138th.
Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 0.298 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 170th.
1.73 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 118th. 6 times more than Mauritius

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 99.76
Ranked 40th. 3% more than Sao Tome and Principe
96.97
Ranked 85th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 4,118.04
Ranked 125th. 42 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
99.01
Ranked 196th.

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 2.57 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 97th. 4 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.613 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 144th.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 11
Ranked 132nd. 38% more than Sao Tome and Principe
8
Ranked 153th.
Water > Percent of water resources used 26.35%
Ranked 23th. 82 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.321%
Ranked 65th.
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 88
Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
35
Ranked 53th.

Pollution > Ozone depleting substance consumption 8.82
Ranked 89th. 63 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.14
Ranked 147th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 3.21
Ranked 95th. 6 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.556
Ranked 152nd.

Forest area > Sq. km 370 km²
Ranked 167th. 37% more than Sao Tome and Principe
270 km²
Ranked 169th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.53
Ranked 78th.
$0.68
Ranked 59th. 30% more than Mauritius

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 90.64
Ranked 96th. 3 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
34.29
Ranked 158th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 3,883.84
Ranked 117th. 30 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
128.24
Ranked 182nd.

Pollution > Ozone depleting substance consumption per million people 6.86
Ranked 37th. 9 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.764
Ranked 123th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 99.67
Ranked 37th. 6% more than Sao Tome and Principe
93.64
Ranked 88th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 89
Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
37
Ranked 60th.
Threatened species 52
Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
16
Ranked 110th.
Adjusted net national income > Current US$ per capita $7,674.17
Ranked 49th. 6 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
$1,221.40
Ranked 108th.

Biodiversity > Number 3.28
Ranked 72nd. 24% more than Sao Tome and Principe
2.65
Ranked 82nd.

Adjusted net national income > Current US$ $9.87 billion
Ranked 105th. 44 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
$223.73 million
Ranked 154th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 3.28
Ranked 73th. 24% more than Sao Tome and Principe
2.65
Ranked 85th.

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources > Total > Billion cubic meters 2.75
Ranked 140th. 26% more than Sao Tome and Principe
2.18
Ranked 144th.

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita > Cubic meters 2,168.1
Ranked 96th.
13,610.2
Ranked 43th. 6 times more than Mauritius

Pollution > PM10, country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 16.1
Ranked 148th.
28.45
Ranked 88th. 77% more than Mauritius

Proportion of land and marine area under protection 0.733%
Ranked 194th. 530 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.00139%
Ranked 219th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 2.59
Ranked 38th.
15.78
Ranked 11th. 6 times more than Mauritius

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 99.89
Ranked 50th. 1% more than Sao Tome and Principe
98.95
Ranked 86th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 89.92%
Ranked 82nd. 4 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
23.28%
Ranked 157th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 0.298 km²
Ranked 168th.
1.75 km²
Ranked 114th. 6 times more than Mauritius

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 674
Ranked 121st. 28 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
24
Ranked 187th.
Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 1.83
Ranked 83th. 3 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.556
Ranked 140th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 1.39
Ranked 37th.
0.0
Ranked 166th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 187th.
0.0
Ranked 167th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 187th.
0.0
Ranked 167th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 1,774.83
Ranked 68th.
0.0
Ranked 166th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 91.63
Ranked 102nd. 2 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
40.83
Ranked 169th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $1.06 billion
Ranked 105th. 71 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
$14.92 million
Ranked 165th.

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 0.297%
Ranked 149th. 202 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.00147%
Ranked 166th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 0.573
Ranked 96th. 3 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
0.175
Ranked 135th.
Emissions > PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 17.6
Ranked 149th.
39.27
Ranked 74th. 2 times more than Mauritius

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 145th.
0.0
Ranked 124th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 89.92
Ranked 82nd. 4 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
23.28
Ranked 157th.

Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change sign date June 10, 1992 June 12, 1992
Forest area > % of land area 18.23% of land area
Ranked 129th.
28.12% of land area
Ranked 103th. 54% more than Mauritius

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 2,343.21
Ranked 124th. 24 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
99.01
Ranked 195th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > Current US$ $1.09 million
Ranked 61st.
0.0
Ranked 117th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 178th.
0.0
Ranked 156th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 151st.
0.0
Ranked 133th.

Climate change > GHG net emissions/removals by LUCF > Mt of CO2 equivalent per million -0.197
Ranked 15th.
-11.387
Ranked 44th. 58 times more than Mauritius
Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 43.1%
Ranked 23th.
0.0
Ranked 166th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 187th.
0.0
Ranked 167th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > % of GNI 0.01%
Ranked 61st.
0.0
Ranked 109th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 56.9%
Ranked 115th.
100%
Ranked 29th. 76% more than Mauritius

PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 15.95 mcg/m³
Ranked 162nd.
47.95 mcg/m³
Ranked 65th. 3 times more than Mauritius

Climate change > GHG net emissions/removals by LUCF > Mt of CO2 equivalent -0.221
Ranked 14th.
-1.545
Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Mauritius
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per PPP $ of GDP $0.26
Ranked 90th.
$0.49
Ranked 38th. 88% more than Mauritius

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2005 PPP $ of GDP $0.28
Ranked 91st.
$0.52
Ranked 38th. 86% more than Mauritius

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > Current US$ $437,623.93
Ranked 133th. 56% more than Sao Tome and Principe
$281,019.75
Ranked 136th.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 0.00595%
Ranked 163th.
0.908%
Ranked 122nd. 153 times more than Mauritius

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 162nd.
0.16%
Ranked 79th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 174th.
0.0
Ranked 153th.

Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$, % of GDP 57.26%
Ranked 34th.
87.45%
Ranked 44th. 53% more than Mauritius
Adjusted net national income > Current US$, % of GDP 87.79%
Ranked 33th.
90.11%
Ranked 17th. 3% more than Mauritius

International agreements > Signed but not ratified none of the selected agreements none of the selected agreements
CO2 Emissions 2,796
Ranked 116th. 28 times more than Sao Tome and Principe
100
Ranked 171st.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.3%
Ranked 88th.
0.48%
Ranked 47th. 60% more than Mauritius

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 11.13%
Ranked 77th. 33% more than Sao Tome and Principe
8.36%
Ranked 126th.

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 0.954%
Ranked 112th.
3.43%
Ranked 77th. 4 times more than Mauritius

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.36% of GNI
Ranked 90th.
1.01% of GNI
Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Mauritius

SOURCES: The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations World Statistics Pocketbook and Statistical Yearbook; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; Food and Agriculture Organisation, AQUASTAT data.; World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Kiren Dev Pandey, David Wheeler, Bart Ostro, Uwe Deichmann, Kirk Hamilton, and Katherine Bolt. ""Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations in Residential and Pollution Hotspot Areas of World Cities: New Estimates Based on the Global Model of Ambient Particulates (GMAPS),"" World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department (2006).; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; Wikipedia: List of parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (List of parties) (Parties & Observers , UNFCCC, 1 June 2011); United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.; Kiran D. Pandey and others' ""The Human Costs of Air Pollution: New Estimates for Developing Countries"" (2006).; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium. GDP figures sourced from World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files.; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×