×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Netherlands & Saint Lucia

Definitions

STAT Netherlands Saint Lucia HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 4
Ranked 182nd.
5
Ranked 164th. 25% more than Netherlands
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 13
Ranked 144th.
21
Ranked 99th. 62% more than Netherlands
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 3
Ranked 170th. 50% more than Saint Lucia
2
Ranked 178th.
CO2 Emissions per 1000 10.77
Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Saint Lucia
2.75
Ranked 76th.
CO2 emissions > Kt 140,893.6 kt
Ranked 28th. 432 times more than Saint Lucia
326.01 kt
Ranked 172nd.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 8.68 kt
Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Saint Lucia
2.02 kt
Ranked 100th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 182,077.55
Ranked 29th. 451 times more than Saint Lucia
403.37
Ranked 177th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 10.96
Ranked 23th. 5 times more than Saint Lucia
2.27
Ranked 105th.

Current issues water pollution in the form of heavy metals, organic compounds, and nutrients such as nitrates and phosphates; air pollution from vehicles and refining activities; acid rain deforestation; soil erosion, particularly in the northern region
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 10.57
Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Saint Lucia
2.26
Ranked 97th.

Endangered species > Bird species 2
Ranked 178th.
5
Ranked 137th. 3 times more than Netherlands

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 4
Ranked 150th. Twice as much as Saint Lucia
2
Ranked 171st.
Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 0.224 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 176th.
1.03 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 144th. 5 times more than Netherlands

Proportion of land area under protection 19.54%
Ranked 70th. 16% more than Saint Lucia
16.86%
Ranked 86th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 32nd. 7% more than Saint Lucia
93.8
Ranked 110th.

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 8.68 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 39th. 4 times more than Saint Lucia
2.03 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 104th.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 11
Ranked 135th.
15
Ranked 91st. 36% more than Netherlands
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 0.0
Ranked 196th.
6
Ranked 100th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 10.96
Ranked 23th. 5 times more than Saint Lucia
2.27
Ranked 105th.

Forest area > Sq. km 3,650 km²
Ranked 141st. 21 times more than Saint Lucia
170 km²
Ranked 172nd.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.27
Ranked 148th.
$0.38
Ranked 117th. 42% more than Netherlands

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 33th. 53% more than Saint Lucia
65.22
Ranked 128th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 173,102.02
Ranked 26th. 454 times more than Saint Lucia
381.06
Ranked 168th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 100
Ranked 32nd. 8% more than Saint Lucia
92.82
Ranked 93th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 0.0
Ranked 209th.
6
Ranked 118th.
Threatened species 19
Ranked 97th. 2 times more than Saint Lucia
9
Ranked 132nd.
Biodiversity > Number 0.17
Ranked 173th.
1.36
Ranked 105th. 8 times more than Netherlands

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 0.17
Ranked 177th.
1.36
Ranked 110th. 8 times more than Netherlands

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.39
Ranked 139th.
$0.45
Ranked 123th. 15% more than Netherlands

Pollution > PM10, country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 29.98
Ranked 78th.
30.77
Ranked 75th. 3% more than Netherlands

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 1,948
Ranked 15th. 70 times more than Saint Lucia
28
Ranked 120th.
CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 PPP $ of GDP 0.3 kg/PPP$
Ranked 91st.
0.37 kg/PPP$
Ranked 70th. 23% more than Netherlands

Proportion of land and marine area under protection 31.48%
Ranked 20th. 13 times more than Saint Lucia
2.49%
Ranked 172nd.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 0.0104
Ranked 189th.
7.89
Ranked 22nd. 762 times more than Netherlands

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 43th. 2% more than Saint Lucia
98.44
Ranked 96th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100%
Ranked 32nd. 56% more than Saint Lucia
64.11%
Ranked 115th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 0.224 km²
Ranked 172nd.
1.03 km²
Ranked 141st. 5 times more than Netherlands

World Heritage Sites (environmental) 1
Ranked 55th. The same as Saint Lucia
1
Ranked 80th.
Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 36,747
Ranked 26th. 418 times more than Saint Lucia
88
Ranked 168th.
Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 25,441.65
Ranked 35th.
0.0
Ranked 147th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 89,793.83
Ranked 17th.
0.0
Ranked 153th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 3.94
Ranked 37th. 73% more than Saint Lucia
2.27
Ranked 70th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 5.4
Ranked 11th.
0.0
Ranked 153th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 1.53
Ranked 36th.
0.0
Ranked 147th.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 6
Ranked 86th.
29
Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Netherlands
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 100
Ranked 35th. 42% more than Saint Lucia
70.42
Ranked 141st.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $122.17 billion
Ranked 14th. 1114 times more than Saint Lucia
$109.63 million
Ranked 145th.

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 61.82%
Ranked 6th. 390 times more than Saint Lucia
0.158%
Ranked 154th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 2.32
Ranked 31st. 4 times more than Saint Lucia
0.567
Ranked 98th.
Emissions > PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 33.71
Ranked 90th. 10% more than Saint Lucia
30.57
Ranked 101st.

Climate change > GHG net emissions/removals by LUCF > Mt of CO2 equivalent 2.48
Ranked 3rd.
-0.345
Ranked 37th.
PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter 34.11 mcg/m³
Ranked 110th. 20% more than Saint Lucia
28.33 mcg/m³
Ranked 123th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ $17.87 billion
Ranked 29th.
0.0
Ranked 140th.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 1.07%
Ranked 120th.
0.0
Ranked 175th.

International agreements > Signed but not ratified none of the selected agreements none of the selected agreements
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.16%
Ranked 142nd.
0.32%
Ranked 74th. Twice as much as Netherlands

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 13.92%
Ranked 20th. 16% more than Saint Lucia
11.99%
Ranked 56th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100
Ranked 32nd. 56% more than Saint Lucia
64.11
Ranked 115th.

Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Kyoto Protocol sign date 29 April 1998 16 March 1998
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Gross savings > % of GNI 10.28%
Ranked 113th.
-5.74%
Ranked 132nd.

Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > % of GNI 0.57% of GNI
Ranked 59th. 3 times more than Saint Lucia
0.17% of GNI
Ranked 113th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 2.04%
Ranked 50th.
0.0
Ranked 121st.

CO2 Emissions 174,809
Ranked 21st. 392 times more than Saint Lucia
445.5
Ranked 149th.
Climate change > GHG net emissions/removals by LUCF > Mt of CO2 equivalent per million 0.15
Ranked 4th.
-2.376
Ranked 72nd.
Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 0.541%
Ranked 124th.
2.09%
Ranked 92nd. 4 times more than Netherlands

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.16% of GNI
Ranked 146th.
0.26% of GNI
Ranked 117th. 63% more than Netherlands

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net national savings > % of GNI -3.64%
Ranked 121st.
-17.73%
Ranked 132nd. 5 times more than Netherlands

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per PPP $ of GDP $0.26
Ranked 91st. 13% more than Saint Lucia
$0.23
Ranked 105th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 35.93%
Ranked 156th.
100%
Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Netherlands

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 49.32%
Ranked 17th.
0.0
Ranked 153th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2005 PPP $ of GDP $0.28
Ranked 92nd. 12% more than Saint Lucia
$0.25
Ranked 103th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 13.97%
Ranked 62nd.
0.0
Ranked 147th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net national savings > Current US$ $-31,913,016,362.28
Ranked 130th. 197 times more than Saint Lucia
$-162,063,306.23
Ranked 118th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > Current US$ $2.01 billion
Ranked 12th. 8423 times more than Saint Lucia
$238,920.72
Ranked 137th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > % of GNI 0.23%
Ranked 65th. 8 times more than Saint Lucia
0.03%
Ranked 132nd.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 157th.
0.0
Ranked 105th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 188th.
0.0
Ranked 130th.

Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change sign date June 4, 1992 June 14, 1993
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 3.08%
Ranked 48th. 28 times more than Saint Lucia
0.11%
Ranked 117th.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 19.77%
Ranked 48th. 7% more than Saint Lucia
18.53%
Ranked 52nd.
Forest area > % of land area 10.77% of land area
Ranked 145th.
27.87% of land area
Ranked 104th. 3 times more than Netherlands

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 65,419.28
Ranked 29th. 162 times more than Saint Lucia
403.37
Ranked 175th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations World Statistics Pocketbook and Statistical Yearbook; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Wikipedia: Table of World Heritage Sites by country (Table of World Heritage Sites); Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Kiren Dev Pandey, David Wheeler, Bart Ostro, Uwe Deichmann, Kirk Hamilton, and Katherine Bolt. ""Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations in Residential and Pollution Hotspot Areas of World Cities: New Estimates Based on the Global Model of Ambient Particulates (GMAPS),"" World Bank, Development Research Group and Environment Department (2006).; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; Wikipedia: List of parties to the Kyoto Protocol (Parties); World Bank national accounts data files.; World Resources Institute. 2003. Carbon Emissions from energy use and cement manufacturing, 1850 to 2000. Available on-line through the Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT) at Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates.; Kiran D. Pandey and others' ""The Human Costs of Air Pollution: New Estimates for Developing Countries"" (2006).; Wikipedia: List of parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (List of parties) (Parties & Observers , UNFCCC, 1 June 2011)

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×