Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Pakistan & Romania

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Pakistan	Romania
Consumption	42.9 billion cu m Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Romania	14.2 billion cu m Ranked 25th.
Consumption > Per capita	217,013.83 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	760,556.7 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Consumption per capita	224.54 cu m Ranked 25th.	786.48 cu m Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Imports	0.0 Ranked 134th.	3.16 billion cu m Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	35,281 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	71,601 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.226 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.	3.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 15 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by households	167,638 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 57% more than Romania	107,027 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	2.2 Ranked 24th. 69% more than Romania	1.3 Ranked 31st.
Production > Billion cubic metres	23.2 Ranked 24th. 76% more than Romania	13.2 Ranked 31st.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.86 Ranked 24th. 76% more than Romania	0.49 Ranked 31st.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.15 Ranked 40th.	0.609 Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Proved reserves	679.6 billion cu m Ranked 28th. 6 times more than Romania	105.5 billion cu m Ranked 49th.
Reserves	695.6 billion cubic feet Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Romania	111.1 billion cubic feet Ranked 34th.
Reserves per capita	4,403.33 cubic feet Ranked 37th.	5,135.35 cubic feet Ranked 34th. 17% more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	12,072 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	31,114 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.097 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.	1.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 14 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	28,675 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	36,362 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 27% more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.184 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 9 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	273,029 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Romania	85,950 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	127,020 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Romania	49,910 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	7.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.	29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	417,768 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 2 times more than Romania	186,225 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	2.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 72nd.	8.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	7.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.	29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Net > Production	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Romania	451,305 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	557,903 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 67% more than Romania	334,311 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	3.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.	15.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Pakistan
Proved > Reserves	840.2 billion cu m Ranked 29th. 13 times more than Romania	63 billion cu m Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	15,184 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	30,136 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 98% more than Pakistan
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.166 Ranked 50th.	0.867 Ranked 32nd. 5 times more than Pakistan
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	2.5 Ranked 25th. 39% more than Romania	1.8 Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	2.64 Terajoules Ranked 71st.	8.61 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Pakistan
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.135 Ranked 39th.	0.549 Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.182 Terajoules Ranked 51st.	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 9 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	2.64 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	7.07 Terajoules Ranked 54th. 3 times more than Pakistan
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.86 Ranked 24th. 76% more than Romania	0.49 Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	1.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.	4.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Pakistan
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	20.9 Ranked 24th. 76% more than Romania	11.9 Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-101 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	-2,346 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 23 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.0961 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	1.39 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 14 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.0764 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 19 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.73 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	3.97 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 2 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 67th.	29.98 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	3.53 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	15.45 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Pakistan
Proved > Reserves per capita	4,852.46 cu m Ranked 52nd. 65% more than Romania	2,938.71 cu m Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.199 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	0.218 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 9% more than Pakistan
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 75th.	255.65 cu m Ranked 7th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.95 Ranked 26th. 36% more than Romania	0.7 Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.	3.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 2 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	417,768 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Romania	152,891 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.223 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	3.31 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 15 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	241.16 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Romania	71.55 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.804 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	2.31 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	72.92 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	1,223.89 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 17 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 67th.	29.98 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	7.74 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	20.86 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	20.86 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Pakistan
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.149 Ranked 50th.	0.779 Ranked 33th. 5 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	6.71 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Pakistan
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	23.1 Ranked 25th. 37% more than Romania	16.9 Ranked 31st.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.077 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.	2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st. 29 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	12,072 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	48,273 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 4 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	2.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.	8.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	196,313 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 35% more than Romania	145,076 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	1.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.	6.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	323,494 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 72% more than Romania	187,687 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.815 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.	2.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	244.56 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Romania	71.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	38,096 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 25 times more than Romania	1,548 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	2.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.	7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th. 3 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 81% more than Romania	648,586 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	11,520 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	26,478 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 81% more than Romania	648,586 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	1.22 million Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Romania	451,305 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	202.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.	218.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th. 8% more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Total resources	31.49 million Terajoules Ranked 26th. 7 times more than Romania	4.72 million Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	323.01 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Romania	156.65 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	25.7 Ranked 25th. 37% more than Romania	18.8 Ranked 31st.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.95 Ranked 26th. 36% more than Romania	0.7 Ranked 30th.
Proved reserves per capita	3,516.89 cu m Ranked 59th.	4,841.56 cu m Ranked 53th. 38% more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-0.639 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	-108.439 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 170 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	1.06 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	4.95 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.0764 Terajoules Ranked 67th.	2.23 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 29 times more than Pakistan
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	2.05 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	8.68 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 4 times more than Pakistan

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Pakistan and Romania in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Pakistan & Romania

Definitions

Citation

Compare Pakistan and Romania in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Pakistan and Romania in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation