Energy > Peat > For fuel use Stats: compare key data on Belarus & Estonia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Belarus	Estonia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	93,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 16% more than Estonia	80,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	9.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.	59.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 6 times more than Belarus
Changes in stocks per million	9,624.34 ton Ranked 4th.	59,431.08 ton Ranked 2nd. 6 times more than Belarus
Consumption by households	3,000 ton Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	9,000 ton Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Estonia	2,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.931 ton Ranked 6th.	1.49 ton Ranked 5th. 60% more than Belarus
Consumption by households per 1000	0.31 ton Ranked 7th.	0.741 ton Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Belarus
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	203.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 14% more than Estonia	179.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	206.15 ton Ranked 3rd. 15% more than Estonia	179.04 ton Ranked 4th.
Energy balance requirement	2.21 million ton Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Estonia	289,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Exports	36,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Estonia	9,000 ton Ranked 4th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	229.22 ton Ranked 3rd. 7% more than Estonia	214.69 ton Ranked 4th.
Net inland availability per 1000	1.14 ton Ranked 8th.	13.37 ton Ranked 3rd. 12 times more than Belarus
Production per 1000	238.85 ton Ranked 4th.	280.81 ton Ranked 3rd. 18% more than Belarus
Recoverable per capita	32.74 ton Ranked 3rd.	1,472.06 ton Ranked 1st. 45 times more than Belarus
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.921 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.	1.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 61% more than Belarus
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.307 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.	0.741 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Belarus
Conversion to other forms of energy	1.99 million ton Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Estonia	241,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	226.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 6% more than Estonia	214.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Exports > Per capita	3.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd.	6.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 86% more than Belarus
Gross inland availability > Per capita	226.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 6% more than Estonia	214.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Gross inland availability	2.21 million ton Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Estonia	289,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Net inland availability	11,000 ton Ranked 10th.	18,000 ton Ranked 8th. 64% more than Belarus
Net inland availability > Per capita	1.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.	13.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 12 times more than Belarus
Statistical differences > Per capita	199.3 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 4th.	22.29 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 1st. 112 times more than Belarus
Production	2.31 million ton Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Estonia	378,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Recoverable	323 million ton Ranked 2nd.	2 billion ton Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Belarus
Recoverable > Per capita	32.54 ton per capita Ranked 3rd.	1,472.06 ton per capita Ranked 1st. 45 times more than Belarus
Production > Per capita	236.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	280.81 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 19% more than Belarus
Energy balance requirement per 1000	229.22 ton Ranked 3rd. 7% more than Estonia	214.69 ton Ranked 4th.
Exports per 1000	3.59 ton Ranked 3rd.	6.69 ton Ranked 2nd. 86% more than Belarus

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation