Energy > Lignite-Brown Coal Briquettes Stats: compare key data on Ireland & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Ireland	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-12,000 ton Ranked 8th. 6 times more than Poland	-2,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Changes in stocks per million	-2,884.675 ton Ranked 10th. 55 times more than Poland	-52.29 ton Ranked 7th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	49.28 ton Ranked 2nd. 1884 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 20th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.246 ton Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	0.0524 ton Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other consumers	1,000 ton Ranked 10th. The same as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.24 ton Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 15th.	2,000 ton Ranked 11th. Twice as much as Ireland
Energy balance requirement per million	-2,644.285 ton Ranked 13th.	52.4 ton Ranked 11th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	49.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 943 times more than Poland	0.052 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Gross inland availability per 1000	49.04 ton Ranked 4th. 936 times more than Poland	0.0524 ton Ranked 21st.
Net inland availability	205,000 ton Ranked 9th. 103 times more than Poland	2,000 ton Ranked 21st.
Net inland availability > Per capita	49.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 948 times more than Poland	0.052 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Production	215,000 ton Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Poland	21,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Production > Per capita	51.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 95 times more than Poland	0.546 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.
Production per 1000	51.68 ton Ranked 4th. 95 times more than Poland	0.546 ton Ranked 15th.
Consumption by industry and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 15th.	2,000 ton Ranked 11th. Twice as much as Ireland
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.246 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	0.052 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	205,000 ton Ranked 7th. 205 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.246 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	0.052 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-2.884 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 57 times more than Poland	-0.051 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	49.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 1896 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.
Exports	23,000 ton Ranked 7th. 23 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Energy balance requirement	-11,000 ton Ranked 13th.	2,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Exports > Per capita	5.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 213 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Gross inland availability	204,000 ton Ranked 9th. 102 times more than Poland	2,000 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.24 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-2.645 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	0.052 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Net inland availability per 1000	49.28 ton Ranked 2nd. 940 times more than Poland	0.0524 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.246 ton Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	0.0524 ton Ranked 11th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-0.239 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.
Exports per 1000	5.53 ton Ranked 5th. 211 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 11th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation