Energy > Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stats: compare key data on Japan & Suriname

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Suriname	HISTORY
Consumption by households	4.56 million ton Ranked 6th. 268 times more than Suriname	17,000 ton Ranked 105th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	35.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.	37.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 6% more than Japan
Consumption by households per 1000	35.68 ton Ranked 36th. 5% more than Suriname	34.03 ton Ranked 42nd.
Consumption by industry and construction	2.28 million ton Ranked 3rd. 569 times more than Suriname	4,000 ton Ranked 78th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	17.82 ton Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Suriname	8.01 ton Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by other consumers	600,000 ton Ranked 7th. 600 times more than Suriname	1,000 ton Ranked 83th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	4.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 2 times more than Suriname	2.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 54th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	11.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 25% more than Suriname	8.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	107,940.58 ton per 1 million people Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Suriname	51,197.81 ton per 1 million people Ranked 19th.
Energy balance requirement per million	107,941.43 ton Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Suriname	46,043.93 ton Ranked 21st.
Gross inland availability per 1000	146.25 ton Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Suriname	46.04 ton Ranked 48th.
Imports	14.11 million ton Ranked 1st. 613 times more than Suriname	23,000 ton Ranked 78th.
Imports per 1000	110.41 ton Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Suriname	46.04 ton Ranked 24th.
Net inland availability per 1000	68.73 ton Ranked 18th. 56% more than Suriname	44.04 ton Ranked 46th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	8.59 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Suriname	2.23 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 12th.
Net inland availability	8.78 million ton Ranked 6th. 399 times more than Suriname	22,000 ton Ranked 111th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	5.18 million ton Ranked 6th. 288 times more than Suriname	18,000 ton Ranked 119th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	40.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 1% more than Suriname	40.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th.
Imports > Per capita	110.41 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Suriname	51.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	146.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Suriname	51.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	68.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 40% more than Suriname	48.97 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	40.57 ton Ranked 37th. 13% more than Suriname	36.03 ton Ranked 44th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	4.7 ton Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Suriname	2 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	17.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. Twice as much as Suriname	8.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.42 million ton Ranked 2nd. 356 times more than Suriname	4,000 ton Ranked 74th.
Gross inland availability	18.69 million ton Ranked 3rd. 812 times more than Suriname	23,000 ton Ranked 112th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	11.14 ton Ranked 9th. 39% more than Suriname	8.01 ton Ranked 16th.
Energy balance requirement	13.79 million ton Ranked 1st. 600 times more than Suriname	23,000 ton Ranked 65th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation