×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Poland & Romania

Definitions

STAT Poland Romania HISTORY
Consumption 14.38 billion cu m
Ranked 24th. 1% more than Romania
14.2 billion cu m
Ranked 25th.

Consumption > Per capita 425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 51st.
760,556.7 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 16th. 79% more than Poland

Consumption per capita 428.03 cu m
Ranked 41st.
786.48 cu m
Ranked 15th. 84% more than Poland

Imports 37.38 billion cu m
Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Romania
3.16 billion cu m
Ranked 41st.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 9,004 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
71,601 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 8 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by households 150,123 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 40% more than Romania
107,027 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 0.2 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
1.44 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 7 times more than Poland

Production None None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day 0.4
Ranked 45th.
1.3
Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Poland
Production > Billion cubic metres 4.4
Ranked 45th.
13.2
Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Poland
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.16
Ranked 45th.
0.49
Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Poland
Production > Billion cubic metres per million 0.115
Ranked 42nd.
0.609
Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Poland
Proved reserves 92 billion cu m
Ranked 53th.
105.5 billion cu m
Ranked 49th. 15% more than Poland

Reserves 154.4 billion cubic feet
Ranked 31st. 39% more than Romania
111.1 billion cubic feet
Ranked 34th.
Reserves per capita 4,045.54 cubic feet
Ranked 39th.
5,135.35 cubic feet
Ranked 34th. 27% more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 2.58 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
3.97 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 54% more than Poland

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 14.91 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.
29.98 Terajoules
Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 9.69 Terajoules
Ranked 43th.
15.45 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 59% more than Poland

Proved > Reserves per capita 4,315.98 cu m
Ranked 55th. 47% more than Romania
2,938.71 cu m
Ranked 59th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 0.0767 Terajoules
Ranked 67th.
0.218 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 3 times more than Poland

Imports per capita 260.91 cu m
Ranked 32nd. 2% more than Romania
255.65 cu m
Ranked 7th.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.49
Ranked 36th.
0.7
Ranked 30th. 43% more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.
3.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th. 54% more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 49,729 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.
152,891 Terajoules
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.236 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
3.31 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 14 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000 0.671 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 4% more than Romania
0.645 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million 287.22 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Romania
71.55 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000 2.46 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 7% more than Romania
2.31 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million 186.56 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
1,223.89 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 14.91 Terajoules
Ranked 60th.
29.98 Terajoules
Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 4.73 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
20.86 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 4.73 Terajoules
Ranked 49th.
20.86 Terajoules
Ranked 31st. 4 times more than Poland

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.312
Ranked 46th.
0.779
Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 6.01 Terajoules
Ranked 29th.
6.71 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 12% more than Poland

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 11.9
Ranked 36th.
16.9
Ranked 31st. 42% more than Poland
Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th.
4.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th. 26% more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th.
3.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 10th. 14 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities 305 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Romania
68 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.

Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities > Per capita 7.99 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Romania
3.14 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 8th.

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 7,618 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
31,114 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th.
1.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita 4.77 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 15th.
16.05 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 78,027 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 2 times more than Romania
36,362 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd. 22% more than Romania
1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita 287.22 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Romania
71.55 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation 10,962 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Romania
1,548 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita 0.671 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 4% more than Romania
0.645 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries 25,600 Terajoules
Ranked 13th. 84% more than Romania
13,944 Terajoules
Ranked 19th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers 182 Terajoules
Ranked 13th.
349 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 92% more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 98,333 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 14% more than Romania
85,950 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses 93,843 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 88% more than Romania
49,910 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita 2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st. 7% more than Romania
2.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 23th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 287.22 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Romania
71.55 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 33th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry 10,962 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 7 times more than Romania
1,548 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 31.55 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 29th.
77.98 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 59th.
29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 63,897 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.
186,225 Terajoules
Ranked 34th. 3 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 76th.
8.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 50th. 5 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 59th.
29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 569,149 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
648,586 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 14% more than Poland

Including LNG > Gross > Production 180,700 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
451,305 Terajoules
Ranked 39th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 68th.
218.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th. 3 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Total resources 2.93 million Terajoules
Ranked 58th.
4.72 million Terajoules
Ranked 49th. 61% more than Poland

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita -26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 35th.
156.65 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 14th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 22,212 Terajoules
Ranked 18th.
30,136 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 36% more than Poland

Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.49
Ranked 36th.
0.7
Ranked 30th. 43% more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000 0.00477 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.
0.0161 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 1.67 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.
8.61 Terajoules
Ranked 50th. 5 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 0.358 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.
1.54 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million 220.91 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
-108.439 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 3.93 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
4.95 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 26% more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 0.928 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.
2.23 Terajoules
Ranked 31st. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 3.39 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.
8.68 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities per 1000 0.00799 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Romania
0.00314 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 0.582 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.
1.39 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 42nd.
2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 31st. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 35,420 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
48,273 Terajoules
Ranked 31st. 36% more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.
8.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 229,354 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 58% more than Romania
145,076 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 29th.
6.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 12% more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 129,549 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
187,687 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 45% more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants 13,647 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.
33,334 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture 1,204 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
1,687 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 40% more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 28th.
1.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 77th.
7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 54th. 5 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 569,149 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
648,586 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 14% more than Poland

Including LNG > Imports 398,547 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Romania
194,935 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses 7,120 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.
26,478 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th. 16% more than Romania
9.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 39th.

Including LNG > Net > Production 180,700 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.
451,305 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Net inland availability 369,865 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 11% more than Romania
334,311 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th.
15.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 32nd. 59% more than Poland

Proved > Reserves 164.8 billion cu m
Ranked 47th. 3 times more than Romania
63 billion cu m
Ranked 58th.

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 0.346
Ranked 46th.
0.867
Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Poland
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 13.2
Ranked 36th.
18.8
Ranked 31st. 42% more than Poland
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 1.3
Ranked 36th.
1.8
Ranked 30th. 38% more than Poland
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.102
Ranked 42nd.
0.549
Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 2.04 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 22% more than Romania
1.68 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million 287.22 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Romania
71.55 Terajoules
Ranked 28th.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million 31.55 Terajoules
Ranked 29th.
77.98 Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 1.3 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.
7.07 Terajoules
Ranked 54th. 5 times more than Poland

Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.16
Ranked 45th.
0.49
Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Poland
Proved reserves per capita 2,396.84 cu m
Ranked 62nd.
4,841.56 cu m
Ranked 53th. 2 times more than Poland

Including LNG > Imports per 1000 10.44 Terajoules
Ranked 33th. 16% more than Romania
9.01 Terajoules
Ranked 38th.

Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent 3.9
Ranked 45th.
11.9
Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Poland
Including LNG > Changes in stocks 8,431 Terajoules
Ranked 5th.
-2,346 Terajoules
Ranked 29th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×