Transport > Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high: Countries Compared
DEFINITION:
Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high). Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.
CONTENTS
Loading...
# | COUNTRY | AMOUNT | DATE | GRAPH | HISTORY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
=1 | Denmark | 4.14 | 2012 | ||
=1 | Finland | 4.14 | 2012 | ||
3 | Austria | 4.1 | 2012 | ||
4 | Germany | 4.09 | 2012 | ||
5 | Hong Kong | 4.08 | 2012 | ||
6 | Singapore | 4.07 | 2012 | ||
7 | Netherlands | 4.05 | 2012 | ||
8 | Belgium | 3.98 | 2012 | ||
9 | Japan | 3.97 | 2012 | ||
10 | United States | 3.96 | 2012 | ||
11 | United Kingdom | 3.93 | 2012 | ||
12 | Sweden | 3.9 | 2012 | ||
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) | 3.9 | 2012 | |||
13 | Canada | 3.85 | 2012 | ||
=14 | Luxembourg | 3.82 | 2012 | ||
=14 | France | 3.82 | 2012 | ||
16 | Australia | 3.75 | 2012 | ||
17 | United Arab Emirates | 3.74 | 2012 | ||
18 | Switzerland | 3.71 | 2012 | ||
19 | Spain | 3.69 | 2012 | ||
=20 | Italy | 3.65 | 2012 | ||
=20 | South Korea | 3.65 | 2012 | ||
High income OECD countries average (profile) | 3.63 | 2012 | |||
Non-religious countries average (profile) | 3.59 | 2012 | |||
22 | Norway | 3.57 | 2012 | ||
23 | South Africa | 3.56 | 2012 | ||
24 | Ireland | 3.54 | 2012 | ||
25 | Turkey | 3.52 | 2012 | ||
Eurozone average (profile) | 3.5 | 2012 | |||
26 | Israel | 3.5 | 2010 | ||
27 | Portugal | 3.48 | 2012 | ||
=28 | Iceland | 3.47 | 2012 | ||
=28 | China | 3.47 | 2012 | ||
30 | European Union | 3.45 | 2012 | ||
European Union average (profile) | 3.45 | 2012 | |||
31 | Malaysia | 3.45 | 2012 | ||
NATO countries average (profile) | 3.4 | 2012 | |||
32 | Czech Republic | 3.34 | 2012 | ||
33 | Poland | 3.3 | 2012 | ||
=34 | New Zealand | 3.25 | 2012 | ||
=34 | Slovenia | 3.25 | 2012 | ||
=34 | Qatar | 3.25 | 2012 | ||
Europe average (profile) | 3.23 | 2012 | |||
37 | Hungary | 3.18 | 2012 | ||
Cold countries average (profile) | 3.17 | 2012 | |||
38 | Cyprus | 3.17 | 2012 | ||
=39 | India | 3.14 | 2012 | ||
=39 | Philippines | 3.14 | 2012 | ||
=41 | Tunisia | 3.12 | 2012 | ||
=41 | Brazil | 3.12 | 2012 | ||
43 | Bulgaria | 3.1 | 2012 | ||
44 | Slovakia | 3.07 | 2012 | ||
45 | Mexico | 3.02 | 2012 | ||
Emerging markets average (profile) | 3.02 | 2012 | |||
46 | Malta | 3.01 | 2012 | ||
47 | Chile | 3 | 2012 | ||
48 | Saudi Arabia | 2.99 | 2012 | ||
=49 | Uruguay | 2.98 | 2012 | ||
=49 | Thailand | 2.98 | 2012 | ||
=51 | Egypt | 2.95 | 2012 | ||
=51 | Argentina | 2.95 | 2012 | ||
=51 | Colombia | 2.95 | 2012 | ||
54 | Bahrain | 2.94 | 2012 | ||
55 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.93 | 2012 | ||
56 | Croatia | 2.92 | 2012 | ||
Potential Future EU Members average (profile) | 2.91 | 2012 | |||
=57 | Peru | 2.91 | 2012 | ||
=57 | Lithuania | 2.91 | 2012 | ||
59 | Benin | 2.9 | 2012 | ||
60 | Morocco | 2.89 | 2012 | ||
=61 | Malawi | 2.85 | 2012 | ||
=61 | Ukraine | 2.85 | 2012 | ||
=61 | Indonesia | 2.85 | 2012 | ||
64 | Panama | 2.84 | 2012 | ||
65 | Romania | 2.83 | 2012 | ||
66 | Estonia | 2.82 | 2012 | ||
Eastern Europe average (profile) | 2.81 | 2012 | |||
=67 | Sri Lanka | 2.8 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Serbia | 2.8 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Madagascar | 2.8 | 2012 | ||
70 | Yemen | 2.79 | 2012 | ||
=71 | Guatemala | 2.78 | 2012 | ||
=71 | Georgia | 2.78 | 2012 | ||
73 | Pakistan | 2.77 | 2012 | ||
74 | Greece | 2.76 | 2012 | ||
75 | Kazakhstan | 2.75 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Botswana | 2.74 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Dominican Republic | 2.74 | 2012 | ||
=78 | Cote d'Ivoire | 2.73 | 2012 | ||
=78 | Oman | 2.73 | 2012 | ||
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) | 2.73 | 2012 | |||
Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) | 2.73 | 2012 | |||
Religious countries average (profile) | 2.71 | 2012 | |||
80 | The Bahamas | 2.69 | 2012 | ||
=81 | Kuwait | 2.68 | 2012 | ||
=81 | Vietnam | 2.68 | 2012 | ||
=81 | Ghana | 2.68 | 2012 | ||
=81 | Maldives | 2.68 | 2012 | ||
85 | Mauritius | 2.67 | 2012 | ||
=86 | Iran | 2.66 | 2012 | ||
=86 | Republic of Macedonia | 2.66 | 2012 | ||
=88 | Namibia | 2.65 | 2012 | ||
=88 | Belarus | 2.65 | 2012 | ||
=88 | Russia | 2.65 | 2012 | ||
=88 | Albania | 2.65 | 2012 | ||
=88 | Ecuador | 2.65 | 2012 | ||
=93 | Latvia | 2.64 | 2012 | ||
=93 | Tanzania | 2.64 | 2012 | ||
South Asia average (profile) | 2.62 | 2012 | |||
OPEC countries average (profile) | 2.61 | 2012 | |||
95 | El Salvador | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
=96 | Guinea | 2.59 | 2012 | ||
=96 | Uganda | 2.59 | 2010 | ||
=98 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.58 | 2012 | ||
=98 | Bolivia | 2.58 | 2012 | ||
Muslim countries average (profile) | 2.58 | 2012 | |||
=100 | The Gambia | 2.55 | 2012 | ||
=100 | Senegal | 2.55 | 2012 | ||
Former Soviet republics average (profile) | 2.54 | 2012 | |||
102 | Costa Rica | 2.53 | 2012 | ||
103 | Nigeria | 2.52 | 2012 | ||
South and Central Asia average (profile) | 2.52 | 2012 | |||
104 | Cambodia | 2.5 | 2012 | ||
=105 | Niger | 2.49 | 2012 | ||
=105 | Laos | 2.49 | 2012 | ||
=105 | Paraguay | 2.49 | 2012 | ||
108 | Syria | 2.48 | 2012 | ||
109 | Liberia | 2.46 | 2012 | ||
=110 | Honduras | 2.44 | 2012 | ||
=110 | Bangladesh | 2.44 | 2010 | ||
Former French colonies average (profile) | 2.44 | 2012 | |||
=112 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.42 | 2012 | ||
=112 | Lesotho | 2.42 | 2012 | ||
=112 | Bhutan | 2.42 | 2012 | ||
=112 | Burma | 2.42 | 2012 | ||
116 | Cameroon | 2.41 | 2012 | ||
=117 | Gabon | 2.4 | 2012 | ||
=117 | Armenia | 2.4 | 2012 | ||
119 | Uzbekistan | 2.39 | 2012 | ||
=120 | Lebanon | 2.38 | 2012 | ||
=120 | Kenya | 2.38 | 2012 | ||
failed states average (profile) | 2.37 | 2012 | |||
122 | Montenegro | 2.35 | 2012 | ||
123 | Turkmenistan | 2.34 | 2010 | ||
=124 | Sudan | 2.33 | 2012 | ||
=124 | Venezuela | 2.33 | 2012 | ||
=124 | Guyana | 2.33 | 2012 | ||
Sub-Saharan Africa average (profile) | 2.32 | 2007 | |||
127 | Nicaragua | 2.31 | 2010 | ||
128 | Togo | 2.29 | 2012 | ||
=129 | Burkina Faso | 2.28 | 2012 | ||
=129 | Mauritania | 2.28 | 2012 | ||
131 | Zimbabwe | 2.27 | 2012 | ||
=132 | Libya | 2.25 | 2012 | ||
=132 | Kyrgyzstan | 2.25 | 2012 | ||
134 | Tajikistan | 2.22 | 2012 | ||
=135 | Jamaica | 2.21 | 2012 | ||
=135 | Cuba | 2.21 | 2012 | ||
=137 | Comoros | 2.2 | 2012 | ||
=137 | Mozambique | 2.2 | 2010 | ||
139 | Iraq | 2.19 | 2012 | ||
=140 | Fiji | 2.18 | 2012 | ||
=140 | Papua New Guinea | 2.18 | 2012 | ||
=142 | Jordan | 2.17 | 2012 | ||
=142 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2.17 | 2012 | ||
=144 | Ethiopia | 2.16 | 2012 | ||
=144 | Afghanistan | 2.16 | 2012 | ||
=146 | Republic of the Congo | 2.15 | 2012 | ||
=146 | Moldova | 2.15 | 2012 | ||
=148 | Azerbaijan | 2.14 | 2012 | ||
=148 | Solomon Islands | 2.14 | 2012 | ||
=150 | Algeria | 2.13 | 2012 | ||
=150 | Mali | 2.13 | 2010 | ||
152 | Nepal | 2.12 | 2012 | ||
153 | Rwanda | 2.06 | 2012 | ||
154 | Eritrea | 2.03 | 2012 | ||
155 | Zambia | 2.01 | 2010 | ||
=156 | Angola | 2 | 2012 | ||
=156 | Chad | 2 | 2012 | ||
158 | Sierra Leone | 1.98 | 2012 | ||
159 | Mongolia | 1.88 | 2012 | ||
160 | Djibouti | 1.84 | 2012 | ||
161 | Haiti | 1.74 | 2012 | ||
162 | East Timor | 1.6 | 2007 | ||
163 | Burundi | 1.43 | 2012 | ||
164 | Somalia | 1.33 | 2010 |
Citation
Interesting observations about Transport > Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high
- United Arab Emirates ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Muslim countries in 2012.
- Finland ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Europe in 2012.
- Hong Kong ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Hot countries in 2012.
- South Africa ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Emerging markets in 2012.
- Denmark ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst NATO countries in 2012.
- Malaysia ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Religious countries in 2012.
- Singapore ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Former British colonies in 2012.
- Austria ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Catholic countries in 2012.
- Germany ranked #4 for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Christian countries in 2012.
- Philippines ranked first for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics services > 1=low to 5=high amongst Former Spanish colonies in 2012.