×

Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards: Countries Compared

DEFINITION: Quality of port infrastructure, WEF (1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards). The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).

CONTENTS

# COUNTRY AMOUNT DATE GRAPH HISTORY
=1 Singapore 6.8 2012
=1 Netherlands 6.8 2012
3 Hong Kong 6.5 2012
=4 United Arab Emirates 6.4 2012
=4 Panama 6.4 2012
=6 Belgium 6.3 2012
=6 Finland 6.3 2012
8 Iceland 6.2 2012
=9 Germany 6 2012
=9 Bahrain 6 2012
11 Sweden 5.9 2012
=12 Spain 5.8 2012
=12 United Kingdom 5.8 2012
=12 Denmark 5.8 2012
=15 Malta 5.7 2012
=15 Canada 5.7 2012
=17 United States 5.6 2012
=17 Estonia 5.6 2012
=17 Barbados 5.6 2012
=20 New Zealand 5.5 2012
=20 Luxembourg 5.5 2012
=20 Malaysia 5.5 2012
=20 South Korea 5.5 2012
=24 Namibia 5.4 2012
=24 Oman 5.4 2012
=24 Norway 5.4 2012
=24 France 5.4 2012
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) 5.37 2012
Eurozone average (profile) 5.32 2012
=28 Saudi Arabia 5.3 2012
=28 Ireland 5.3 2012
High income OECD countries average (profile) 5.3 2012
=30 Switzerland 5.2 2012
=30 Puerto Rico 5.2 2012
=30 Chile 5.2 2012
=30 Japan 5.2 2012
=30 Slovenia 5.2 2012
=30 Lithuania 5.2 2012
=30 Qatar 5.2 2012
=37 Jamaica 5.1 2012
=37 Australia 5.1 2012
Non-religious countries average (profile) 5.1 2012
39 European Union 5.03 2012
European Union average (profile) 5.03 2012
=40 Seychelles 5 2012
=40 Cyprus 5 2012
=40 Suriname 5 2012
=40 Portugal 5 2012
NATO countries average (profile) 4.93 2012
=44 Sri Lanka 4.9 2012
=44 Uruguay 4.9 2012
=44 Austria 4.9 2012
=47 Latvia 4.8 2012
=47 The Gambia 4.8 2012
=47 Morocco 4.8 2012
=47 Mauritius 4.8 2012
=51 South Africa 4.7 2012
=51 Dominican Republic 4.7 2012
Europe average (profile) 4.65 2012
=53 Honduras 4.6 2012
=53 Cote d'Ivoire 4.6 2012
=53 Czech Republic 4.6 2012
=53 Thailand 4.6 2012
=53 Tunisia 4.6 2011
=58 Brunei 4.5 2012
=58 Senegal 4.5 2012
Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) 4.45 2012
=60 China 4.4 2012
=60 Pakistan 4.4 2012
=60 Jordan 4.4 2012
=60 Zimbabwe 4.4 2012
=60 Turkey 4.4 2012
=65 Mexico 4.3 2012
=65 Georgia 4.3 2012
=67 Cambodia 4.2 2012
=67 Greece 4.2 2012
=67 Republic of Macedonia 4.2 2012
=67 Swaziland 4.2 2012
OPEC countries average (profile) 4.14 2012
=71 Zambia 4.1 2012
=71 Kuwait 4.1 2012
=71 Mali 4.1 2012
=71 Lebanon 4.1 2012
=71 Liberia 4.1 2012
Emerging markets average (profile) 4.04 2012
=76 Egypt 4 2012
=76 Croatia 4 2012
=76 Iran 4 2012
=76 Ukraine 4 2012
=76 Azerbaijan 4 2012
=76 India 4 2012
=76 Guatemala 4 2012
=76 Ghana 4 2012
=76 Hungary 4 2012
=76 Slovakia 4 2012
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) 3.92 2012
=86 Cape Verde 3.9 2012
=86 Israel 3.9 2012
=86 Italy 3.9 2012
=86 El Salvador 3.9 2012
=86 Ecuador 3.9 2012
=91 Uganda 3.8 2012
=91 Kenya 3.8 2012
=91 Trinidad and Tobago 3.8 2012
Potential Future EU Members average (profile) 3.79 2012
=94 Bulgaria 3.7 2012
=94 Russia 3.7 2012
=94 Benin 3.7 2012
=94 Albania 3.7 2012
=94 Botswana 3.7 2012
=94 Mauritania 3.7 2012
=94 Malawi 3.7 2012
=94 Cameroon 3.7 2012
Former Soviet republics average (profile) 3.68 2012
Eastern Europe average (profile) 3.63 2012
=102 Argentina 3.6 2012
=102 Paraguay 3.6 2012
=102 Nigeria 3.6 2012
=102 Indonesia 3.6 2012
=102 Montenegro 3.6 2012
=102 Burkina Faso 3.6 2012
=108 Poland 3.5 2012
=108 Peru 3.5 2012
=108 Rwanda 3.5 2012
=108 Guinea 3.5 2012
=108 Libya 3.5 2012
=108 Ethiopia 3.5 2012
=114 Kazakhstan 3.4 2012
=114 Mozambique 3.4 2012
=114 Vietnam 3.4 2012
=114 Lesotho 3.4 2012
=114 Syria 3.4 2011
=119 Guyana 3.3 2012
=119 Bolivia 3.3 2012
=119 Philippines 3.3 2012
=119 Sierra Leone 3.3 2012
=119 Bangladesh 3.3 2012
=119 Tanzania 3.3 2012
=119 Belize 3.3 2011
=126 Nicaragua 3.2 2012
=126 Colombia 3.2 2012
=126 Madagascar 3.2 2012
=129 Armenia 3 2012
=129 Mongolia 3 2012
=129 Yemen 3 2012
=129 Moldova 3 2012
133 Chad 2.8 2012
=134 Algeria 2.7 2012
=134 Serbia 2.7 2012
=134 Nepal 2.7 2012
=134 East Timor 2.7 2012
=138 Burundi 2.6 2012
=138 Brazil 2.6 2012
=138 Romania 2.6 2012
=138 Gabon 2.6 2012
142 Venezuela 2.5 2012
143 Costa Rica 2.4 2012
144 Angola 2.3 2011
145 Haiti 1.9 2012
=146 Tajikistan 1.7 2012
=146 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.7 2012
148 Kyrgyzstan 1.5 2012

Citation

Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards: Countries Compared Map

NationMaster

Interesting observations about Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards

Follow us on Facebook to get interesting stats:

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×