Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Romania & Turkey

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Romania	Turkey
Consumption	14.2 billion cu m Ranked 25th.	44.71 billion cu m Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Romania
Consumption > Per capita	760,556.7 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 48% more than Turkey	514,343.67 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 48th.
Consumption per capita	786.48 cu m Ranked 15th. 60% more than Turkey	492.27 cu m Ranked 39th.
Imports	3.16 billion cu m Ranked 41st.	45.92 billion cu m Ranked 9th. 15 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	71,601 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Turkey	31,009 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 8 times more than Turkey	0.43 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	107,027 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	222,586 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 5 times more than Turkey	0.302 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	31,114 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 66 times more than Turkey	475 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	36,362 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	91,368 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 33% more than Turkey	1.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	1,548 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	4,925 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	71.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 27th. 5% more than Turkey	68.34 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 28th.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	105.5 billion cu m Ranked 49th. 17 times more than Turkey	6.17 billion cu m Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.645 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 15 times more than Turkey	0.043 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	13,944 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Turkey	3,091 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	3,147 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 90% more than Turkey	1,660 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	85,950 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 17% more than Turkey	73,201 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	49,910 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 2 times more than Turkey	22,615 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Turkey	14.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	186,225 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	587,146 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	8.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th. 6% more than Turkey	8.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Turkey	14.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	9.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.	14.29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 59% more than Romania
Including LNG > Net > Production	451,305 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 13 times more than Turkey	34,355 Terajoules Ranked 61st.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	334,311 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	444,877 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 33% more than Romania
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	15.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Turkey	6.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.
Proved > Reserves	63 billion cu m Ranked 58th. 10 times more than Turkey	6.09 billion cu m Ranked 83th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	30,136 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 38% more than Turkey	21,788 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.867 Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Turkey	0.331 Ranked 47th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.8 Ranked 30th.	2.1 Ranked 28th. 17% more than Romania
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	8.61 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	8.67 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 1% more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 25% more than Turkey	1.35 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	71.55 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	72.7 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 2% more than Romania
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	7.07 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	8.67 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 23% more than Romania
Proved reserves per capita	4,841.56 cu m Ranked 53th. 63 times more than Turkey	76.5 cu m Ranked 96th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	4.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 60% more than Turkey	3.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	9.01 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	15.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 69% more than Romania
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-2,346 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	3,735 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 180 times more than Turkey	0.00799 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	3.97 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Turkey	1.08 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	29.98 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 92% more than Turkey	15.65 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	15.45 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 2 times more than Turkey	6.57 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Proved > Reserves per capita	2,938.71 cu m Ranked 59th. 35 times more than Turkey	84.39 cu m Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.218 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 25 times more than Turkey	0.00864 Terajoules Ranked 87th.
Imports per capita	255.65 cu m Ranked 7th.	502.1 cu m Ranked 23th. 96% more than Romania
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 30th.	0.82 Ranked 28th. 17% more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	3.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Turkey	1.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	152,891 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	587,146 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.31 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 7 times more than Turkey	0.458 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.645 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 14 times more than Turkey	0.0456 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	71.55 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	72.7 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 2% more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	2.31 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 7 times more than Turkey	0.334 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	1,223.89 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 94 times more than Turkey	13.06 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	29.98 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 92% more than Turkey	15.65 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	20.86 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 39 times more than Turkey	0.531 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	20.86 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 41 times more than Turkey	0.507 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.779 Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Turkey	0.298 Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	6.71 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 45% more than Turkey	4.63 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	16.9 Ranked 31st.	19.9 Ranked 28th. 18% more than Romania
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2005 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per million	145.46 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Turkey	24.5 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st. 34 times more than Turkey	0.066 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	48,273 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 10 times more than Turkey	4,751 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	8.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Turkey	1.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	145,076 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	313,954 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 2 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	6.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 54% more than Turkey	4.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	187,687 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 49% more than Turkey	125,998 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	2.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 7 times more than Turkey	0.314 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	71.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 33th. 5% more than Turkey	68.34 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	1,548 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	4,925 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.	8.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th. 15% more than Romania
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	648,586 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	1.06 million Terajoules Ranked 26th. 63% more than Romania
Including LNG > Imports	194,935 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	1.03 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Romania
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	26,478 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 30 times more than Turkey	885 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	648,586 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	1.06 million Terajoules Ranked 26th. 63% more than Romania
Including LNG > Gross > Production	451,305 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 13 times more than Turkey	35,965 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	218.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th. 27 times more than Turkey	8.12 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Total resources	4.72 million Terajoules Ranked 49th. 8 times more than Turkey	585,315 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	156.65 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.	-116,738,898.859 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 29th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	18.8 Ranked 31st.	22.1 Ranked 28th. 18% more than Romania
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 30th.	0.82 Ranked 28th. 17% more than Romania
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-108.439 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	55.13 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	4.95 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 51% more than Turkey	3.29 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	2.23 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 32 times more than Turkey	0.0701 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	8.68 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Turkey	1.86 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.39 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Turkey	0.322 Terajoules Ranked 31st.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Romania and Turkey in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Romania & Turkey

Definitions

Citation

Compare Romania and Turkey in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Romania and Turkey in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation