Energy > Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stats: compare key data on Sweden & Tanzania

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Sweden	Tanzania	HISTORY
Consumption by households	1,000 ton Ranked 144th.	6,000 ton Ranked 127th. 6 times more than Sweden
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.111 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 141st.	0.156 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 138th. 41% more than Sweden
Consumption by households per 1000	0.111 ton Ranked 136th.	0.155 ton Ranked 133th. 40% more than Sweden
Energy balance requirement	760,000 ton Ranked 12th. 127 times more than Tanzania	6,000 ton Ranked 95th.
Energy balance requirement per million	84,167.89 ton Ranked 5th. 545 times more than Tanzania	154.54 ton Ranked 104th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	132.12 ton Ranked 12th. 855 times more than Tanzania	0.155 ton Ranked 149th.
Imports	1.16 million ton Ranked 11th. 193 times more than Tanzania	6,000 ton Ranked 110th.
Imports per 1000	128.47 ton Ranked 4th. 831 times more than Tanzania	0.155 ton Ranked 123th.
Net inland availability per 1000	41.75 ton Ranked 49th. 270 times more than Tanzania	0.155 ton Ranked 145th.
Production from refineries	433,000 ton Ranked 39th. 108 times more than Tanzania	4,000 ton Ranked 94th.
Production from refineries > Per capita	47.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 397 times more than Tanzania	0.121 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 93th.
Production from refineries per 1000	47.95 ton Ranked 20th. 398 times more than Tanzania	0.121 ton Ranked 92nd.
Statistical differences > Per capita	12.52 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 4th. 77 times more than Tanzania	162.78 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 65th.
Total > Production	433,000 ton Ranked 46th. 108 times more than Tanzania	4,000 ton Ranked 97th.
Total > Production per 1000	47.95 ton Ranked 30th. 398 times more than Tanzania	0.121 ton Ranked 95th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	36,000 ton Ranked 95th. 6 times more than Tanzania	6,000 ton Ranked 137th.
Gross inland availability	1.19 million ton Ranked 32nd. 199 times more than Tanzania	6,000 ton Ranked 144th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	3.99 ton Ranked 114th. 26 times more than Tanzania	0.155 ton Ranked 143th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	84,219.49 ton per 1 million people Ranked 6th. 540 times more than Tanzania	155.93 ton per 1 million people Ranked 108th.
Net inland availability	377,000 ton Ranked 49th. 63 times more than Tanzania	6,000 ton Ranked 141st.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	3.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 120th. 26 times more than Tanzania	0.156 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 150th.
Imports > Per capita	128.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 824 times more than Tanzania	0.156 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 129th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	132.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 847 times more than Tanzania	0.156 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 156th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	41.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 54th. 268 times more than Tanzania	0.156 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 152nd.
Total > Production > Per capita	47.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 397 times more than Tanzania	0.121 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 96th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation