Energy > Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stats: compare key data on Burma & Pakistan

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Burma	Pakistan	HISTORY
Consumption by households	5,000 ton Ranked 128th.	385,000 ton Ranked 38th. 77 times more than Burma
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.099 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 143th.	2.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 121st. 25 times more than Burma
Consumption by households per 1000	0.0996 ton Ranked 138th.	2.44 ton Ranked 116th. 24 times more than Burma
Consumption by other consumers	5,000 ton Ranked 68th.	194,000 ton Ranked 15th. 39 times more than Burma
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.099 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.	1.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 60th. 13 times more than Burma
Energy balance requirement per million	-40.341 ton Ranked 118th.	158.26 ton Ranked 103th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	0.379 ton Ranked 144th.	3.68 ton Ranked 126th. 10 times more than Burma
Imports	1,000 ton Ranked 123th.	25,000 ton Ranked 76th. 25 times more than Burma
Imports per 1000	0.0214 ton Ranked 128th.	0.158 ton Ranked 122nd. 7 times more than Burma
Net inland availability per 1000	0.319 ton Ranked 141st.	3.67 ton Ranked 124th. 11 times more than Burma
Production from plants > Per capita	0.218 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.	1.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 6 times more than Burma
Production from plants per 1000	0.219 ton Ranked 37th.	1.28 ton Ranked 33th. 6 times more than Burma
Production from refineries per 1000	0.159 ton Ranked 87th.	2.25 ton Ranked 77th. 14 times more than Burma
Statistical differences > Per capita	59.38 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Pakistan	19.26 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 28th.
Total > Production per 1000	0.379 ton Ranked 89th.	3.53 ton Ranked 80th. 9 times more than Burma
Production from refineries > Per capita	0.158 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 91st.	2.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th. 14 times more than Burma
Production from refineries	8,000 ton Ranked 89th.	355,000 ton Ranked 41st. 44 times more than Burma
Total > Production	19,000 ton Ranked 87th.	557,000 ton Ranked 42nd. 29 times more than Burma
Consumption by households and other consumers	10,000 ton Ranked 126th.	579,000 ton Ranked 35th. 58 times more than Burma
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.198 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 149th.	3.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 122nd. 19 times more than Burma
Gross inland availability	19,000 ton Ranked 118th.	582,000 ton Ranked 42nd. 31 times more than Burma
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.199 ton Ranked 142nd.	3.67 ton Ranked 115th. 18 times more than Burma
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0996 ton Ranked 81st.	1.23 ton Ranked 56th. 12 times more than Burma
Energy balance requirement	-2,000 ton Ranked 122nd.	25,000 ton Ranked 62nd.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-40.434 ton per 1 million people Ranked 122nd.	160.49 ton per 1 million people Ranked 107th.
Net inland availability	16,000 ton Ranked 123th.	579,000 ton Ranked 42nd. 36 times more than Burma
Production from plants	11,000 ton Ranked 36th.	202,000 ton Ranked 24th. 18 times more than Burma
Imports > Per capita	0.022 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 128th.	0.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 128th. 7 times more than Burma
Gross inland availability > Per capita	0.376 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 151st.	3.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 131st. 10 times more than Burma
Net inland availability > Per capita	0.317 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 148th.	3.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 129th. 12 times more than Burma
Total > Production > Per capita	0.376 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 93th.	3.58 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 82nd. 10 times more than Burma

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation