Energy > Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Namibia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Namibia	HISTORY
Consumption by industry and construction	731,000 ton Ranked 8th. 122 times more than Namibia	6,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	22.63 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 8 times more than Namibia	2.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	22.62 ton Ranked 8th. 8 times more than Namibia	2.96 ton Ranked 45th.
Consumption by other consumers	522,000 ton Ranked 8th. 75 times more than Namibia	7,000 ton Ranked 46th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	16.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Namibia	3.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	731,000 ton Ranked 5th. 122 times more than Namibia	6,000 ton Ranked 66th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	22.63 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than Namibia	2.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption in agriculture	138,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 138 times more than Namibia	1,000 ton Ranked 27th.
Energy balance requirement	-325,000 ton Ranked 138th.	7,000 ton Ranked 89th.
Energy balance requirement per million	-10,058.183 ton Ranked 126th.	3,453.34 ton Ranked 78th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	45 ton Ranked 52nd. 13 times more than Namibia	3.45 ton Ranked 127th.
Imports	218,000 ton Ranked 30th. 31 times more than Namibia	7,000 ton Ranked 104th.
Imports per 1000	6.95 ton Ranked 78th. 2 times more than Namibia	3.45 ton Ranked 89th.
Net inland availability per 1000	56.82 ton Ranked 28th. 16 times more than Namibia	3.45 ton Ranked 125th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-7,647,295,581,906.56 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 65th.	4.11 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 28th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	27.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th. 57 times more than Namibia	0.492 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 145th.
Gross inland availability	1.45 million ton Ranked 28th. 208 times more than Namibia	7,000 ton Ranked 138th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	27.95 ton Ranked 56th. 57 times more than Namibia	0.493 ton Ranked 138th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	16.15 ton Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Namibia	3.98 ton Ranked 24th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	4.27 ton Ranked 1st. 9 times more than Namibia	0.493 ton Ranked 16th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-10,062.231 ton per 1 million people Ranked 130th.	3,446.15 ton per 1 million people Ranked 82nd.
Net inland availability	1.84 million ton Ranked 17th. 262 times more than Namibia	7,000 ton Ranked 136th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	4.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 9 times more than Namibia	0.492 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	903,000 ton Ranked 24th. 903 times more than Namibia	1,000 ton Ranked 152nd.
Imports > Per capita	6.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 76th. 2 times more than Namibia	3.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th. 13 times more than Namibia	3.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 133th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	56.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 16 times more than Namibia	3.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 131st.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	22.62 ton Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than Namibia	2.96 ton Ranked 39th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation