Energy > Vegetal waste Stats: compare key data on Cuba & Panama

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Cuba	Panama	HISTORY
Consumption by industry and construction	4.95 million ton Ranked 5th. 38 times more than Panama	128,640 ton Ranked 31st.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	439.31 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 11 times more than Panama	39.81 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by other industries and construction	4.95 million ton Ranked 5th. 38 times more than Panama	128,640 ton Ranked 31st.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	439.31 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 11 times more than Panama	39.81 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	388,880 ton Ranked 10th. 9 times more than Panama	45,520 ton Ranked 17th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	34.44 ton Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Panama	13.52 ton Ranked 14th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	388,880 ton Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Panama	45,520 ton Ranked 21st.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	34.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 2 times more than Panama	14.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	34.44 ton Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Panama	13.52 ton Ranked 18th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	472.87 ton Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Panama	51.74 ton Ranked 44th.
Net inland availability	4.95 million ton Ranked 10th. 38 times more than Panama	128,640 ton Ranked 43th.
Net inland availability per 1000	438.43 ton Ranked 3rd. 11 times more than Panama	38.22 ton Ranked 33th.
Production	5.34 million ton Ranked 14th. 31 times more than Panama	174,160 ton Ranked 56th.
Production > Per capita	473.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Panama	53.89 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.
Production per 1000	472.87 ton Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Panama	51.74 ton Ranked 44th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	34.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Panama	14.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.
Gross inland availability	5.34 million ton Ranked 14th. 31 times more than Panama	174,160 ton Ranked 56th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	473.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Panama	53.89 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.
Energy balance requirement	5.34 million ton Ranked 14th. 31 times more than Panama	174,160 ton Ranked 56th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	0.081 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 20th.	-0.001 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 28th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	439.31 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 11 times more than Panama	39.81 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	473.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Panama	53.89 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	472.87 ton Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Panama	51.74 ton Ranked 44th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	438.43 ton Ranked 1st. 11 times more than Panama	38.22 ton Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	438.43 ton Ranked 1st. 11 times more than Panama	38.22 ton Ranked 22nd.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation