Energy > Vegetal waste Stats: compare key data on Poland & Sweden

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Poland	Sweden	HISTORY
Consumption by industry and construction	2.48 million ton Ranked 8th.	3.54 million ton Ranked 6th. 43% more than Poland
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	65.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.	392.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 6 times more than Poland
Consumption by other industries and construction	2.48 million ton Ranked 8th.	3.49 million ton Ranked 6th. 41% more than Poland
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	65.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.	386.75 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 6 times more than Poland
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	954,960 ton Ranked 4th.	6.4 million ton Ranked 1st. 7 times more than Poland
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	25.02 ton Ranked 11th.	708.78 ton Ranked 1st. 28 times more than Poland
Conversion to other forms of energy	954,960 ton Ranked 8th.	9.75 million ton Ranked 1st. 10 times more than Poland
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	25.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th.	1,080.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 43 times more than Poland
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	25.02 ton Ranked 12th.	1,079.79 ton Ranked 1st. 43 times more than Poland
Gross inland availability per 1000	90.04 ton Ranked 29th.	1,334.74 ton Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Poland
Net inland availability	2.48 million ton Ranked 14th.	3.54 million ton Ranked 12th. 43% more than Poland
Net inland availability per 1000	65.02 ton Ranked 23th.	392.38 ton Ranked 4th. 6 times more than Poland
Production	3.44 million ton Ranked 19th.	12.05 million ton Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Poland
Production > Per capita	90.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	1,335.56 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Poland
Production per 1000	90.04 ton Ranked 29th.	1,334.74 ton Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Poland
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	25.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	709.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 28 times more than Poland
Gross inland availability	3.44 million ton Ranked 19th.	12.05 million ton Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Poland
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	90.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	1,335.56 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Poland
Energy balance requirement	3.44 million ton Ranked 19th.	12.05 million ton Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Poland
Statistical differences > Per capita	-0.011 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 24th.	-137,503,823,121,351 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 26th. 12500347556486456 times more than Poland
Net inland availability > Per capita	65.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.	392.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 6 times more than Poland
Gross inland availability > Per capita	90.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	1,335.56 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Poland
Energy balance requirement per 1000	90.04 ton Ranked 29th.	1,334.74 ton Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Poland
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	65.02 ton Ranked 14th.	392.38 ton Ranked 2nd. 6 times more than Poland
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	65.02 ton Ranked 14th.	386.51 ton Ranked 2nd. 6 times more than Poland

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation