Energy > Other Petroleum Products Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by industry and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 27th.	32,000 ton Ranked 10th. 32 times more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.187 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	13.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 74 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 26th.	32,000 ton Ranked 9th. 32 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.187 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	13.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 74 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.187 ton Ranked 24th.	13.91 ton Ranked 4th. 75 times more than Denmark
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	7,000 ton Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.29 ton Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 6th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.
Energy balance requirement per million	2,850.05 ton Ranked 24th.	10,432.46 ton Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Denmark
Gross inland availability per 1000	2.85 ton Ranked 59th.	10.43 ton Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Denmark
Imports	15,000 ton Ranked 38th.	25,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 67% more than Denmark
Imports per 1000	2.85 ton Ranked 32nd.	10.87 ton Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability per 1000	0.187 ton Ranked 32nd.	14.34 ton Ranked 7th. 77 times more than Denmark
Net transfers per 1000	-1.292 ton Ranked 14th.	-3.912 ton Ranked 16th. 3 times more than Denmark
Transfers in per million	-1,291.648 ton Ranked 3rd.	-3,912.173 ton Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy	7,000 ton Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	2.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	10.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement	15,000 ton Ranked 31st.	24,000 ton Ranked 18th. 60% more than Denmark
Gross inland availability	15,000 ton Ranked 67th.	24,000 ton Ranked 67th. 60% more than Denmark
Gross inland availability > Per capita	2.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 62nd.	10.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th. 4 times more than Denmark
Net transfers > Per capita	-1.292 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.	-3.912 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability > Per capita	0.187 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.	14.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 77 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability	1,000 ton Ranked 34th.	33,000 ton Ranked 16th. 33 times more than Denmark
Net transfers	-7,000 ton Ranked 14th.	-9,000 ton Ranked 15th. 29% more than Denmark
Imports > Per capita	2.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.	10.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Denmark
Statistical differences > Per capita	-187,359,105,952.323 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 13th.	-434,688,111,280.156 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Denmark
Transfers in > Per capita	-1.292 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.	-3.912 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Denmark
Transfers in	-7,000 ton Ranked 2nd.	-9,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 29% more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	1.29 ton Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 13th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.187 ton Ranked 25th.	13.91 ton Ranked 4th. 75 times more than Denmark

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation