Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Finland & New Zealand

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Finland	New Zealand	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	1,000 ton Ranked 129th. The same as New Zealand	1,000 ton Ranked 150th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.197 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 123th.	0.246 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 149th. 25% more than Finland
Consumption by transportation industry	1,000 ton Ranked 12th. The same as New Zealand	1,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	0.196 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.	0.244 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 24% more than Finland
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	0.196 ton Ranked 8th.	0.242 ton Ranked 6th. 24% more than Finland
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	0.196 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	0.244 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 24% more than Finland
Energy balance requirement	26,000 ton Ranked 39th. 26 times more than New Zealand	1,000 ton Ranked 112th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	5.01 ton Ranked 87th. 7 times more than New Zealand	0.726 ton Ranked 131st.
Imports	40,000 ton Ranked 39th. 40 times more than New Zealand	1,000 ton Ranked 112th.
Imports per 1000	7.62 ton Ranked 41st. 27 times more than New Zealand	0.28 ton Ranked 104th.
Net transfers > Per capita	45.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st.	-0.747 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Production from refineries	3,000 ton Ranked 101st. 50% more than New Zealand	2,000 ton Ranked 85th.
Production from refineries > Per capita	0.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 91st. 21% more than New Zealand	0.488 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	5.01 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 7th.	-243,967,893,825.172 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 37th.
Total > Production	3,000 ton Ranked 101st. 50% more than New Zealand	2,000 ton Ranked 85th.
Imports > Per capita	7.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 48th. 27 times more than New Zealand	0.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 102nd.
Net transfers	233,000 ton Ranked 4th.	-3,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Net inland availability	1,000 ton Ranked 134th.	4,000 ton Ranked 136th. 4 times more than Finland
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.197 ton Ranked 122nd.	0.245 ton Ranked 139th. 24% more than Finland
Gross inland availability > Per capita	5.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th. 7 times more than New Zealand	0.732 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 142nd.
Gross inland availability	26,000 ton Ranked 83th. 9 times more than New Zealand	3,000 ton Ranked 147th.
Energy balance requirement per million	5,011.56 ton Ranked 51st. 21 times more than New Zealand	241.9 ton Ranked 100th.
Total > Production per 1000	0.59 ton Ranked 89th. 22% more than New Zealand	0.484 ton Ranked 74th.
Net inland availability per 1000	0.196 ton Ranked 124th.	0.968 ton Ranked 120th. 5 times more than Finland
Production from refineries per 1000	0.59 ton Ranked 89th. 22% more than New Zealand	0.484 ton Ranked 74th.
Consumption in road transport per 1000	0.196 ton Ranked 5th.	0.242 ton Ranked 2nd. 24% more than Finland
Net transfers per 1000	45.01 ton Ranked 1st.	-0.745 ton Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	0.196 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 125th.	0.976 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 129th. 5 times more than Finland
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	5,011.57 ton per million people Ranked 49th. 21 times more than New Zealand	243.97 ton per million people Ranked 108th.
Consumption in road transport	1,000 ton Ranked 8th. The same as New Zealand	1,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-13,343.244 ton per million people Ranked 46th. 55 times more than New Zealand	-243.967 ton per million people Ranked 32nd.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation