Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Philippines & Zambia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Philippines	Zambia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-57,000 ton Ranked 36th.	71,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.724 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.	6.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	7.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st.	11.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th. 59% more than Philippines
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	7.06 ton Ranked 60th.	11.77 ton Ranked 58th. 67% more than Philippines
Consumption by other industries and construction	485,000 ton Ranked 31st. 4 times more than Zambia	135,000 ton Ranked 55th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	34.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th. 31 times more than Zambia	1.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 60th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	2.85 million ton Ranked 38th. 219 times more than Zambia	13,000 ton Ranked 65th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	34.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th. 31 times more than Zambia	1.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 70th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	42.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th. 3 times more than Zambia	13.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Gross inland availability	3.57 million ton Ranked 40th. 22 times more than Zambia	161,000 ton Ranked 74th.
Production	178,000 ton Ranked 39th.	244,000 ton Ranked 37th. 37% more than Philippines
Production > Per capita	2.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th.	20.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 10 times more than Philippines
Production per 1000	2.07 ton Ranked 44th.	21.27 ton Ranked 35th. 10 times more than Philippines
Recoverable > Reserves	41 million ton Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Zambia	10 million ton Ranked 42nd.
Recoverable > Reserves per capita	0.478 ton Ranked 42nd.	0.872 ton Ranked 39th. 82% more than Philippines
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.65 ton Ranked 60th.	11.77 ton Ranked 54th. 2 times more than Philippines
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st.	11.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 54th. 98% more than Philippines
Gross inland availability per 1000	41.55 ton Ranked 65th. 3 times more than Zambia	14.04 ton Ranked 78th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	33.24 ton Ranked 45th. 29 times more than Zambia	1.13 ton Ranked 59th.
Consumption by industry and construction	606,000 ton Ranked 33th. 4 times more than Zambia	135,000 ton Ranked 56th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-12,252,346,385.594 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 27th.	-93,439,518,001.589 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 24th. 8 times more than Philippines
Net inland availability	606,000 ton Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Zambia	148,000 ton Ranked 57th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	42.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th. 3 times more than Zambia	13.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	7.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.	12.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 62nd. 74% more than Philippines
Energy balance requirement	3.57 million ton Ranked 40th. 22 times more than Zambia	161,000 ton Ranked 74th.
Changes in stocks per million	-704.107 ton Ranked 30th.	6,190.05 ton Ranked 24th.
Net inland availability per 1000	7.06 ton Ranked 63th.	12.9 ton Ranked 61st. 83% more than Philippines
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	33.24 ton Ranked 49th. 29 times more than Zambia	1.13 ton Ranked 69th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	41.55 ton Ranked 65th. 3 times more than Zambia	14.04 ton Ranked 78th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	2.85 million ton Ranked 33th. 219 times more than Zambia	13,000 ton Ranked 60th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation