Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Cuba & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Cuba	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	8,000 ton Ranked 31st.	1.47 million ton Ranked 7th. 184 times more than Cuba
Changes in stocks > Per capita	0.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.	38.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 54 times more than Cuba
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 27th.	272.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 1432 times more than Cuba
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.189 ton Ranked 27th.	272.16 ton Ranked 1st. 1443 times more than Cuba
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 77th.	147.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 127 times more than Cuba
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.15 ton Ranked 76th.	147.04 ton Ranked 9th. 128 times more than Cuba
Consumption by other consumers	2,000 ton Ranked 20th.	997,000 ton Ranked 6th. 499 times more than Cuba
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.189 ton Ranked 19th.	26.12 ton Ranked 6th. 138 times more than Cuba
Consumption by other industries and construction	13,000 ton Ranked 74th.	4.12 million ton Ranked 14th. 317 times more than Cuba
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 76th.	107.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 94 times more than Cuba
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.15 ton Ranked 75th.	107.95 ton Ranked 9th. 94 times more than Cuba
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	11.6 ton Ranked 2nd. 5 times more than Poland	2.25 ton Ranked 10th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 96th.	2,107.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 1826 times more than Cuba
Gross inland availability	13,000 ton Ranked 96th.	80.44 million ton Ranked 7th. 6188 times more than Cuba
Gross inland availability per 1000	1.15 ton Ranked 96th.	2,107.61 ton Ranked 3rd. 1831 times more than Cuba
Imports per 1000	1.86 ton Ranked 77th.	88.35 ton Ranked 36th. 48 times more than Cuba
Consumption by households and other consumers	2,000 ton Ranked 29th.	10.39 million ton Ranked 2nd. 5194 times more than Cuba
Consumption by industry and construction	13,000 ton Ranked 75th.	5.61 million ton Ranked 15th. 432 times more than Cuba
Statistical differences > Per capita	2.14 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 39th.	35.66 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 7th. 17 times more than Cuba
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	11.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 5 times more than Poland	2.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Imports > Per capita	1.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th.	88.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th. 47 times more than Cuba
Net inland availability	13,000 ton Ranked 80th.	16 million ton Ranked 7th. 1231 times more than Cuba
Gross inland availability > Per capita	1.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 96th.	2,107.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 1826 times more than Cuba
Net inland availability > Per capita	1.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.	419.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 363 times more than Cuba
Energy balance requirement	13,000 ton Ranked 96th.	80.44 million ton Ranked 7th. 6188 times more than Cuba
Changes in stocks per million	708.46 ton Ranked 31st.	38,490.31 ton Ranked 3rd. 54 times more than Cuba
Net inland availability per 1000	1.15 ton Ranked 78th.	419.2 ton Ranked 4th. 364 times more than Cuba
Energy balance requirement per 1000	1.15 ton Ranked 96th.	2,107.61 ton Ranked 3rd. 1831 times more than Cuba
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th.	26.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 137 times more than Cuba
Imports	21,000 ton Ranked 79th.	3.37 million ton Ranked 30th. 161 times more than Cuba
Consumption for non-energy uses	123,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 43% more than Poland	86,000 ton Ranked 8th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation