Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Estonia & Sweden

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Estonia	Sweden	HISTORY
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-2,118.643 ton per million people Ranked 48th. 19 times more than Sweden	-110.814 ton per million people Ranked 26th.
Consumption by households	14,000 ton Ranked 79th. 5 times more than Sweden	3,000 ton Ranked 118th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	9.89 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 30 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 125th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	20,000 ton Ranked 76th. 7 times more than Sweden	3,000 ton Ranked 133th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	14.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 43 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 142nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants	5,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Sweden	1,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	3.53 ton Ranked 2nd. 32 times more than Sweden	0.111 ton Ranked 5th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	3.53 ton Ranked 2nd. 32 times more than Sweden	0.111 ton Ranked 6th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	31,779.66 ton per million people Ranked 9th. 72 times more than Sweden	443.26 ton per million people Ranked 99th.
Exports	9,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 5 times more than Sweden	2,000 ton Ranked 44th.
Exports per 1000	6.36 ton Ranked 15th. 28 times more than Sweden	0.226 ton Ranked 37th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	31.79 ton Ranked 29th. 72 times more than Sweden	0.443 ton Ranked 141st.
Imports	51,000 ton Ranked 35th. 17 times more than Sweden	3,000 ton Ranked 95th.
Imports per 1000	36.03 ton Ranked 15th. 108 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton Ranked 101st.
Statistical differences > Per capita	33.49 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 10th. 302 times more than Sweden	110.82 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 22nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	3.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 32 times more than Sweden	0.111 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	5,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Sweden	1,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	3.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 32 times more than Sweden	0.111 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Energy balance requirement	45,000 ton Ranked 29th. 11 times more than Sweden	4,000 ton Ranked 88th.
Imports > Per capita	36.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 108 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 109th.
Net inland availability	40,000 ton Ranked 61st. 13 times more than Sweden	3,000 ton Ranked 139th.
Exports > Per capita	6.36 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 28 times more than Sweden	0.226 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	31.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 72 times more than Sweden	0.443 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 152nd.
Gross inland availability	45,000 ton Ranked 76th. 11 times more than Sweden	4,000 ton Ranked 140th.
Energy balance requirement per million	31,788.78 ton Ranked 11th. 72 times more than Sweden	442.99 ton Ranked 91st.
Net inland availability per 1000	28.26 ton Ranked 21st. 85 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton Ranked 137th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	28.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 85 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 148th.
Consumption by households per 1000	9.89 ton Ranked 36th. 30 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton Ranked 116th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	14.13 ton Ranked 35th. 43 times more than Sweden	0.332 ton Ranked 131st.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation