Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Latvia & Malaysia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Latvia	Malaysia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-4,000 ton Ranked 36th.	-279,180 ton Ranked 46th. 70 times more than Latvia
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-1.739 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.	-11.014 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th. 6 times more than Latvia
Changes in stocks per million	-1,738.743 ton Ranked 36th.	-10,802.731 ton Ranked 42nd. 6 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.	84.36 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	15.21 ton Ranked 54th.	82.74 ton Ranked 20th. 5 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction	35,000 ton Ranked 64th.	2.14 million ton Ranked 16th. 61 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	15.21 ton Ranked 49th.	82.74 ton Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia
Conversion to other forms of energy	9,000 ton Ranked 67th.	8.79 million ton Ranked 23th. 977 times more than Latvia
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.	346.76 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 89 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.	448.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 9 times more than Latvia
Exports	2,000 ton Ranked 37th.	69,790 ton Ranked 26th. 35 times more than Latvia
Exports > Per capita	0.816 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.	2.75 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Latvia
Exports per 1000	0.822 ton Ranked 31st.	2.7 ton Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.	11.38 million ton Ranked 24th. 95 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability per 1000	47.82 ton Ranked 38th.	82.74 ton Ranked 24th. 73% more than Latvia
Gross inland availability per 1000	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.	440.33 ton Ranked 32nd. 8 times more than Latvia
Changes in stocks at importers	-75,000 ton Ranked 9th.	-245,000 ton Ranked 1st. 3 times more than Latvia
Changes in stocks at importers > Per capita	-29.002 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 2 times more than Malaysia	-12.349 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st.
Consumption by industry and construction	35,000 ton Ranked 68th.	2.14 million ton Ranked 21st. 61 times more than Latvia
Statistical differences > Per capita	414.94 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 25th.	17.83 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 10th. 43 times more than Latvia
Imports > Per capita	50.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.	413.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 8 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability	110,000 ton Ranked 62nd.	2.14 million ton Ranked 22nd. 19 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability > Per capita	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.	448.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 9 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability > Per capita	47.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.	84.36 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 76% more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th.	84.36 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 6 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.	11.38 million ton Ranked 24th. 95 times more than Latvia
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	3.91 ton Ranked 63th.	340.1 ton Ranked 29th. 87 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement per 1000	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.	440.33 ton Ranked 32nd. 8 times more than Latvia
Imports	116,000 ton Ranked 62nd.	10.49 million ton Ranked 17th. 90 times more than Latvia
Imports per 1000	50.42 ton Ranked 44th.	405.84 ton Ranked 18th. 8 times more than Latvia
Changes in stocks at importers per million	-29,259.272 ton Ranked 13th. 2 times more than Malaysia	-12,124.784 ton Ranked 1st.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation