×

Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Norway

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Brazil Norway HISTORY
Changes in stocks -50,000 ton
Ranked 39th.
-323,000 ton
Ranked 47th. 6 times more than Brazil

Changes in stocks > Per capita -0.268 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th.
-69.864 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 50th. 261 times more than Brazil

Consumption 23.5 million
Ranked 12th. 15 times more than Norway
1.57 million
Ranked 19th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 1.16 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 22nd.
40.02 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 3rd. 34 times more than Brazil

Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 26.92 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 45th.
149.46 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 8th. 6 times more than Brazil

Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 26.96 ton
Ranked 44th.
149.46 ton
Ranked 7th. 6 times more than Brazil

Consumption by other industries and construction 1.59 million ton
Ranked 22nd. 8 times more than Norway
192,000 ton
Ranked 45th.

Consumption per capita 0.135
Ranked 16th.
0.35
Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Brazil
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 27.41 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 48th. 5 times more than Norway
5.41 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 57th.

Conversion to other forms of energy 14.83 million ton
Ranked 17th. 593 times more than Norway
25,000 ton
Ranked 64th.

Energy balance requirement > Per capita 107.31 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 51st.
171.96 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 48th. 60% more than Brazil

Gross inland availability 20 million ton
Ranked 18th. 25 times more than Norway
795,000 ton
Ranked 55th.

Production 6.25 million ton
Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Norway
1.47 million ton
Ranked 28th.

Production > Per capita 33.56 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 30th.
318.17 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 23th. 9 times more than Brazil

Production per 1000 33.6 ton
Ranked 30th.
318.17 ton
Ranked 23th. 9 times more than Brazil

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 11.4
Ranked 22nd. 19 times more than Norway
0.6
Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Per $ GDP 7.64e-12 per $1
Ranked 43th. 2 times more than Norway
3.28e-12 per $1
Ranked 46th.
Imports 13.7 million ton
Ranked 13th. 21 times more than Norway
667,000 ton
Ranked 46th.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.062
Ranked 41st.
0.131
Ranked 37th. 2 times more than Brazil
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 79.56 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 44th. 15 times more than Norway
5.41 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 62nd.

Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 8.56 ton
Ranked 57th.
41.53 ton
Ranked 29th. 5 times more than Brazil

Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 8.55 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 58th.
41.53 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Brazil

Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 17.23 ton
Ranked 13th.
67.92 ton
Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Brazil

Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 17.21 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 14th.
67.92 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Brazil

Changes in stocks per million -268.612 ton
Ranked 33th.
-69,863.653 ton
Ranked 49th. 260 times more than Brazil

Changes in stocks at producers per 1000 -7.124 ton
Ranked 1st.
-15.306 ton
Ranked 15th. 2 times more than Brazil

Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 79.67 ton
Ranked 43th. 15 times more than Norway
5.41 ton
Ranked 61st.

Gross inland availability per 1000 107.47 ton
Ranked 50th.
171.96 ton
Ranked 46th. 60% more than Brazil

Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 27.45 ton
Ranked 47th. 5 times more than Norway
5.41 ton
Ranked 56th.

Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 1.17 ton
Ranked 21st.
40.01 ton
Ranked 2nd. 34 times more than Brazil

Imports per 1000 73.59 ton
Ranked 40th.
144.27 ton
Ranked 32nd. 96% more than Brazil

Changes in stocks at producers -1,278,000 ton
Ranked 1st. 19 times more than Norway
-66,000 ton
Ranked 12th.

Consumption by chemical industry 217,000 ton
Ranked 10th. 17% more than Norway
185,000 ton
Ranked 12th.

Consumption by industry and construction 5.02 million ton
Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Norway
691,000 ton
Ranked 31st.

Statistical differences > Per capita 461.36 billion ton per 1e+15 people
Ranked 21st.
17.09 trillion ton per 1e+15 people
Ranked 11th. 37 times more than Brazil

Imports > Per capita 73.49 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 42nd.
144.27 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 33th. 96% more than Brazil

Net inland availability 5.02 million ton
Ranked 17th. 7 times more than Norway
691,000 ton
Ranked 34th.

Gross inland availability > Per capita 107.31 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 51st.
171.96 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 48th. 60% more than Brazil

Net inland availability > Per capita 26.92 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 53th.
149.46 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 9th. 6 times more than Brazil

Energy balance requirement 20 million ton
Ranked 18th. 25 times more than Norway
795,000 ton
Ranked 55th.

Net inland availability per 1000 26.96 ton
Ranked 52nd.
149.46 ton
Ranked 8th. 6 times more than Brazil

Energy balance requirement per 1000 107.47 ton
Ranked 50th.
171.96 ton
Ranked 46th. 60% more than Brazil

Consumption by iron and steel industry 3.21 million ton
Ranked 4th. 10 times more than Norway
314,000 ton
Ranked 14th.

Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita -7.144 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 1st.
-15.306 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 15th. 2 times more than Brazil

Conversion in thermal power plants 5.11 million ton
Ranked 26th. 204 times more than Norway
25,000 ton
Ranked 59th.

SOURCES: Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×