Energy > Other Petroleum Products Stats: compare key data on Latvia & Netherlands

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Latvia	Netherlands	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	1,000 ton Ranked 21st.	13,000 ton Ranked 7th. 13 times more than Latvia
Changes in stocks per million	434.69 ton Ranked 14th.	796.58 ton Ranked 9th. 83% more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector	34,000 ton Ranked 13th.	497,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	14.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	30.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	14.33 ton Ranked 5th.	30.45 ton Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction	32,000 ton Ranked 10th.	73,000 ton Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	13.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Netherlands	4.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	13.91 ton Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Netherlands	4.48 ton Ranked 10th.
Energy balance requirement per million	10,432.46 ton Ranked 14th.	57,353.41 ton Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Latvia
Exports per 1000	4.3 ton Ranked 20th.	192.53 ton Ranked 2nd. 45 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability per 1000	10.43 ton Ranked 43th.	375.49 ton Ranked 2nd. 36 times more than Latvia
Imports	25,000 ton Ranked 32nd.	4.09 million ton Ranked 2nd. 164 times more than Latvia
Imports per 1000	10.87 ton Ranked 16th.	250.68 ton Ranked 1st. 23 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability per 1000	14.34 ton Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Netherlands	4.48 ton Ranked 15th.
Net transfers per 1000	-3.912 ton Ranked 16th.	169.79 ton Ranked 2nd.
Consumption by other industries and construction	32,000 ton Ranked 9th.	73,000 ton Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	13.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Netherlands	4.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	7.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 18 times more than Latvia
Conversion to other forms of energy	1,000 ton Ranked 15th.	128,000 ton Ranked 7th. 128 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	10.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.	57.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement	24,000 ton Ranked 18th.	936,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 39 times more than Latvia
Exports	10,000 ton Ranked 39th.	3.14 million ton Ranked 1st. 314 times more than Latvia
Exports > Per capita	4.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.	192.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 45 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability	24,000 ton Ranked 67th.	6.13 million ton Ranked 4th. 255 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability > Per capita	10.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.	375.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 36 times more than Latvia
Net transfers > Per capita	-3.912 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th.	169.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	14.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Netherlands	4.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.
Net inland availability	33,000 ton Ranked 16th.	73,000 ton Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Latvia
Net transfers	-9,000 ton Ranked 15th.	2.77 million ton Ranked 3rd.
Imports > Per capita	10.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.	250.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 23 times more than Latvia
Statistical differences > Per capita	-434,688,111,280.156 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 20th.	6.56 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 4th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.435 ton Ranked 13th.	7.84 ton Ranked 4th. 18 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	13.91 ton Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Netherlands	4.48 ton Ranked 11th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation