Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Canada & Tanzania

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Tanzania	HISTORY
Additional resources	26.05 billion ton Ranked 6th. 17 times more than Tanzania	1.5 billion ton Ranked 1st.
Additional resources per capita	868.54 ton Ranked 6th. 21 times more than Tanzania	41.89 ton Ranked 2nd.
Changes in stocks	-2,070,000 ton Ranked 50th. 188 times more than Tanzania	-11,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-64.089 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 48th. 169 times more than Tanzania	-0.379 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 27th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	56.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 75 times more than Tanzania	0.754 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	56.45 ton Ranked 27th. 76 times more than Tanzania	0.747 ton Ranked 77th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.82 million ton Ranked 18th. 63 times more than Tanzania	29,000 ton Ranked 67th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	317.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 265 times more than Tanzania	1.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.
Production	28.59 million ton Ranked 13th. 381 times more than Tanzania	75,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Production > Per capita	885.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 454 times more than Tanzania	1.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.
Production per 1000	884.69 ton Ranked 13th. 458 times more than Tanzania	1.93 ton Ranked 45th.
Recoverable > Reserves	3.47 billion ton Ranked 11th. 17 times more than Tanzania	200 million ton Ranked 24th.
Recoverable > Reserves per capita	107.42 ton Ranked 11th. 21 times more than Tanzania	5.15 ton Ranked 27th.
Total known > Reserves	8.62 billion ton Ranked 4th. 28 times more than Tanzania	304 million ton Ranked 3rd.
Total resources in place	8.62 billion ton Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Tanzania	1.8 billion ton Ranked 3rd.
Conversion to other forms of energy	14.53 million ton Ranked 18th. 316 times more than Tanzania	46,000 ton Ranked 63th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	467.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 240 times more than Tanzania	1.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 94th.
Gross inland availability	15.11 million ton Ranked 20th. 201 times more than Tanzania	75,000 ton Ranked 83th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	449.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 376 times more than Tanzania	1.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 69th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	56.45 ton Ranked 19th. 76 times more than Tanzania	0.747 ton Ranked 76th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	56.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 75 times more than Tanzania	0.754 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 77th.
Changes in stocks per million	-64,062.887 ton Ranked 47th. 169 times more than Tanzania	-378.432 ton Ranked 27th.
Net inland availability per 1000	56.82 ton Ranked 31st. 76 times more than Tanzania	0.747 ton Ranked 79th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	467.54 ton Ranked 31st. 242 times more than Tanzania	1.93 ton Ranked 93th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	467.54 ton Ranked 31st. 242 times more than Tanzania	1.93 ton Ranked 93th.
Total known > Reserves per capita	282.79 ton Ranked 5th. 33 times more than Tanzania	8.49 ton Ranked 3rd.
Total resources in place per capita	282.79 ton Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Tanzania	50.38 ton Ranked 3rd.
Conversion in thermal power plants	10.24 million ton Ranked 19th. 223 times more than Tanzania	46,000 ton Ranked 58th.
Additional resources > Per capita	868.54 ton per capita Ranked 6th. 21 times more than Tanzania	42.12 ton per capita Ranked 2nd.
Consumption by industry and construction	1.82 million ton Ranked 23th. 63 times more than Tanzania	29,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-54,924,301,061,952.398 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 41st.	222.28 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 40th.
Net inland availability	1.84 million ton Ranked 24th. 63 times more than Tanzania	29,000 ton Ranked 76th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	467.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 240 times more than Tanzania	1.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 94th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	56.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 75 times more than Tanzania	0.754 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Total known > Reserves > Per capita	282.79 ton per capita Ranked 5th. 33 times more than Tanzania	8.54 ton per capita Ranked 3rd.
Total resources in place > Per capita	282.79 ton per capita Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Tanzania	50.65 ton per capita Ranked 3rd.
Energy balance requirement	15.11 million ton Ranked 20th. 201 times more than Tanzania	75,000 ton Ranked 83th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	449.68 ton Ranked 27th. 380 times more than Tanzania	1.18 ton Ranked 68th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	316.94 ton Ranked 25th. 268 times more than Tanzania	1.18 ton Ranked 58th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation