Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Cuba & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Cuba	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks > Per capita	1,064.83 ton per million people Ranked 10th.	-52.379 ton per million people Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers	214,000 ton Ranked 26th. 36 times more than Poland	6,000 ton Ranked 119th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	18.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 121 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 154th.
Consumption by industry and construction	2,000 ton Ranked 49th. Twice as much as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by other consumers	1,000 ton Ranked 60th.	6,000 ton Ranked 37th. 6 times more than Cuba
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.089 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 53th. 76% more than Cuba
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.177 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th. 7 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-1,064.829 ton per million people Ranked 128th. 2 times more than Poland	-445.428 ton per million people Ranked 125th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	19.13 ton Ranked 35th. 730 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 158th.
Imports	31,000 ton Ranked 51st. 2 times more than Poland	15,000 ton Ranked 58th.
Imports per 1000	2.79 ton Ranked 72nd. 7 times more than Poland	0.392 ton Ranked 99th.
Production from refineries	228,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 13 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Production from refineries > Per capita	20.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 45 times more than Poland	0.445 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	1.07 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 17th.	-26,201,708,613.418 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 30th.
Total > Production	228,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 13 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Energy balance requirement	-12,000 ton Ranked 128th.	-17,000 ton Ranked 129th. 42% more than Cuba
Imports > Per capita	2.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 71st. 7 times more than Poland	0.392 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 97th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.177 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 49th. 7 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	2,000 ton Ranked 46th. Twice as much as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 49th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	19.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 737 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 169th.
Gross inland availability	216,000 ton Ranked 29th. 216 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 158th.
Energy balance requirement per million	-1,062.692 ton Ranked 120th. 2 times more than Poland	-445.429 ton Ranked 117th.
Total > Production per 1000	20.19 ton Ranked 22nd. 45 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Net inland availability per 1000	19.13 ton Ranked 27th. 730 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 152nd.
Production from refineries per 1000	20.19 ton Ranked 22nd. 45 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.177 ton Ranked 47th. 7 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 57th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0887 ton Ranked 56th.	0.157 ton Ranked 50th. 77% more than Cuba
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.177 ton Ranked 44th. 7 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 56th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	19.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 737 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 162nd.
Net inland availability	216,000 ton Ranked 27th. 216 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 152nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	18.95 ton Ranked 25th. 121 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 144th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation