Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Hong Kong & Norway

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Hong Kong	Norway	HISTORY
Consumption by households	27,000 ton Ranked 63th.	99,000 ton Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by households > Per capita	3.89 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 74th.	21.41 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 27th. 6 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by households and other consumers	27,000 ton Ranked 70th.	105,000 ton Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	3.89 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.	22.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 6 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by industry and construction	5,000 ton Ranked 39th. The same as Norway	5,000 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.734 ton Ranked 25th.	1.12 ton Ranked 20th. 53% more than Hong Kong
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	1.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 56% more than Hong Kong
Energy balance requirement	32,000 ton Ranked 36th.	-17,000 ton Ranked 130th.
Exports	5,000 ton Ranked 33th.	28,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Hong Kong
Exports per 1000	0.734 ton Ranked 27th.	6.06 ton Ranked 15th. 8 times more than Hong Kong
Gross inland availability per 1000	4.7 ton Ranked 88th.	27.25 ton Ranked 26th. 6 times more than Hong Kong
Imports	37,000 ton Ranked 41st. 37 times more than Norway	1,000 ton Ranked 121st.
Imports > Per capita	5.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 62nd. 25 times more than Norway	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 113th.
Imports per 1000	5.43 ton Ranked 55th. 25 times more than Norway	0.216 ton Ranked 105th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	331.38 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 71st.	4.54 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 7th. 14 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.734 ton Ranked 24th.	1.12 ton Ranked 20th. 53% more than Hong Kong
Net inland availability > Per capita	4.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 87th.	22.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Hong Kong
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	4,608.56 ton per million people Ranked 57th.	-3,677.026 ton per million people Ranked 133th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	145.29 ton per million people Ranked 16th.	-2,162.956 ton per million people Ranked 44th.
Net inland availability	32,000 ton Ranked 69th.	105,000 ton Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by households per 1000	3.96 ton Ranked 66th.	21.41 ton Ranked 21st. 5 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	3.96 ton Ranked 77th.	22.71 ton Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Hong Kong
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.	1.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 56% more than Hong Kong
Consumption by other industries and construction	5,000 ton Ranked 35th. The same as Norway	5,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Exports > Per capita	0.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	6.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 8 times more than Hong Kong
Gross inland availability > Per capita	4.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 97th.	27.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 6 times more than Hong Kong
Gross inland availability	32,000 ton Ranked 75th.	126,000 ton Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Hong Kong
Energy balance requirement per million	4,696.77 ton Ranked 50th.	-3,677.034 ton Ranked 125th.
Net inland availability per 1000	4.7 ton Ranked 79th.	22.71 ton Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Hong Kong

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation