Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Latvia & Malaysia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Latvia	Malaysia	HISTORY
Consumption by households	3,000 ton Ranked 101st.	50,210 ton Ranked 48th. 17 times more than Latvia
Consumption by households > Per capita	1.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 96th.	1.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th. 68% more than Latvia
Consumption by households and other consumers	2,000 ton Ranked 140th.	50,210 ton Ranked 55th. 25 times more than Latvia
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.837 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 125th.	1.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 112th. 2 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 55th.	30,520 ton Ranked 14th. 31 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.	1.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement	2,000 ton Ranked 102nd.	-500,370 ton Ranked 144th.
Exports	4,000 ton Ranked 40th.	664,580 ton Ranked 6th. 166 times more than Latvia
Exports per 1000	1.59 ton Ranked 22nd.	25.72 ton Ranked 8th. 16 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability per 1000	0.869 ton Ranked 129th. 78% more than Malaysia	0.487 ton Ranked 138th.
Imports	2,000 ton Ranked 100th.	114,210 ton Ranked 24th. 57 times more than Latvia
Imports per 1000	0.869 ton Ranked 91st.	4.42 ton Ranked 58th. 5 times more than Latvia
Net transfers > Per capita	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.	-2.019 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.
Net transfers per 1000	0.869 ton Ranked 7th.	-1.981 ton Ranked 13th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	2.95 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 14th.	-668,313,911,857.521 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 40th.
Imports > Per capita	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.	4.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th. 5 times more than Latvia
Net transfers	2,000 ton Ranked 11th.	-51,200 ton Ranked 14th.
Consumption by households per 1000	1.19 ton Ranked 95th.	1.94 ton Ranked 91st. 63% more than Latvia
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.837 ton Ranked 123th.	1.94 ton Ranked 103th. 2 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.	1.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 54th.	30,520 ton Ranked 12th. 31 times more than Latvia
Exports > Per capita	1.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.	26.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 17 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability > Per capita	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 140th. 75% more than Malaysia	0.497 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 148th.
Gross inland availability	2,000 ton Ranked 151st.	12,590 ton Ranked 114th. 6 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.421 ton Ranked 40th.	1.18 ton Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.421 ton Ranked 36th.	1.18 ton Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability > Per capita	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 142nd.	3.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 104th. 8 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	869.38 ton per million people Ranked 93th.	-19,740.509 ton per million people Ranked 142nd.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-773.394 ton per million people Ranked 37th.	-1,972.59 ton per million people Ranked 43th. 3 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability	1,000 ton Ranked 157th.	80,730 ton Ranked 47th. 81 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement per million	869.37 ton Ranked 85th.	-19,361.567 ton Ranked 134th.
Net inland availability per 1000	0.421 ton Ranked 141st.	3.12 ton Ranked 96th. 7 times more than Latvia

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation