Energy > Naphtha Stats: compare key data on Australia & Costa Rica

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Australia	Costa Rica	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-15,000 ton Ranked 26th.	2,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.755 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.	0.462 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-0.509 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.	0.907 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	-0.509 ton Ranked 23th.	0.906 ton Ranked 11th.
Consumption by industry and construction	28,000 ton Ranked 17th. 14 times more than Costa Rica	2,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.37 ton Ranked 15th. 2 times more than Costa Rica	0.561 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	28,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 14 times more than Costa Rica	2,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Costa Rica	0.561 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.37 ton Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Costa Rica	0.561 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	1,000 ton Ranked 34th.	16,000 ton Ranked 30th. 16 times more than Australia
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.049 ton Ranked 33th.	3.7 ton Ranked 29th. 76 times more than Australia
Energy balance requirement	15,000 ton Ranked 23th.	-2,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Energy balance requirement per million	753.94 ton Ranked 20th.	-462.949 ton Ranked 22nd.
Gross inland availability per 1000	11.42 ton Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Costa Rica	3.24 ton Ranked 44th.
Production from refineries per 1000	11.42 ton Ranked 45th. 3 times more than Costa Rica	3.7 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.049 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.	3.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 75 times more than Australia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 2 times more than Costa Rica	0.561 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	0.755 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.	-0.462 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	1.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Costa Rica	0.561 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.
Production from refineries > Per capita	11.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Costa Rica	3.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th.
Production from refineries	233,000 ton Ranked 44th. 15 times more than Costa Rica	16,000 ton Ranked 60th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	10.03 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 4th.	-462,189,651,203.957 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 26th.
Total > Production > Per capita	11.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Costa Rica	3.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th.
Changes in stocks at producers	-9,000 ton Ranked 21st.	3,000 ton Ranked 17th.
Net inland availability	28,000 ton Ranked 18th. 14 times more than Costa Rica	2,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Gross inland availability	233,000 ton Ranked 39th. 17 times more than Costa Rica	14,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	11.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Costa Rica	3.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.
Changes in stocks per million	-753.943 ton Ranked 26th.	462.95 ton Ranked 14th.
Net inland availability per 1000	1.37 ton Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Costa Rica	0.561 ton Ranked 31st.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation