×

Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Chile

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Brazil Chile HISTORY
Changes in stocks -50,000 ton
Ranked 39th.
122,000 ton
Ranked 18th.

Changes in stocks > Per capita -0.268 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th.
7.49 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 23th.

Consumption 23.5 million
Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Chile
5.1 million
Ranked 16th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.4
Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Chile
0.1
Ranked 37th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 26.92 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 45th.
41.42 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 36th. 54% more than Brazil

Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 26.96 ton
Ranked 44th.
41.32 ton
Ranked 35th. 53% more than Brazil

Consumption by other industries and construction 1.59 million ton
Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Chile
592,000 ton
Ranked 27th.

Consumption per capita 0.135
Ranked 16th.
0.33
Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Brazil
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 27.41 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 48th.
185.52 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 36th. 7 times more than Brazil

Conversion to other forms of energy 14.83 million ton
Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Chile
3.73 million ton
Ranked 34th.

Energy balance requirement > Per capita 107.31 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 51st.
271.62 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Brazil

Gross inland availability 20 million ton
Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Chile
4.43 million ton
Ranked 35th.

Production 6.25 million ton
Ranked 20th. 11 times more than Chile
544,000 ton
Ranked 34th.

Production > Per capita 33.56 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 30th. 1% more than Chile
33.38 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 31st.

Production per 1000 33.6 ton
Ranked 30th. 1% more than Chile
33.3 ton
Ranked 31st.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 11.4
Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Chile
2.5
Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Per $ GDP 7.64e-12 per $1
Ranked 43th.
1.48e-11 per $1
Ranked 33th. 93% more than Brazil
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 79.56 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 44th.
228.66 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Brazil

Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 8.56 ton
Ranked 57th.
36.24 ton
Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Brazil

Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 8.55 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 58th.
36.33 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Brazil

Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 17.23 ton
Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Chile
5.08 ton
Ranked 25th.

Energy balance requirement 20 million ton
Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Chile
4.43 million ton
Ranked 35th.

Changes in stocks per million -268.612 ton
Ranked 33th.
7,467.37 ton
Ranked 22nd.

Changes in stocks at producers per 1000 -7.124 ton
Ranked 1st.
-16.048 ton
Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Brazil

Net inland availability per 1000 26.96 ton
Ranked 52nd.
42.78 ton
Ranked 42nd. 59% more than Brazil

Conversion in coke ovens per 1000 52.22 ton
Ranked 27th. 21% more than Chile
43.03 ton
Ranked 28th.

Gross inland availability per 1000 107.47 ton
Ranked 50th.
270.91 ton
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Brazil

Consumption by iron and steel industry 3.21 million ton
Ranked 4th. 39 times more than Chile
83,000 ton
Ranked 30th.

Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita -7.144 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 1st.
-16.096 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Brazil

Conversion in thermal power plants 5.11 million ton
Ranked 26th. 69% more than Chile
3.02 million ton
Ranked 31st.

Conversion in coke ovens > Per capita 52.15 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 28th. 21% more than Chile
43.14 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 29th.

Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 27.45 ton
Ranked 47th.
185.03 ton
Ranked 35th. 7 times more than Brazil

Conversion in coke ovens 9.72 million ton
Ranked 10th. 14 times more than Chile
703,000 ton
Ranked 34th.

Changes in stocks at producers -1,278,000 ton
Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Chile
-224,000 ton
Ranked 15th.

Consumption by industry and construction 5.02 million ton
Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Chile
675,000 ton
Ranked 32nd.

Statistical differences > Per capita 461.36 billion ton per 1e+15 people
Ranked 21st. 8 times more than Chile
61.37 billion ton per 1e+15 people
Ranked 24th.

Imports > Per capita 73.49 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 42nd.
245.72 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Brazil

Net inland availability 5.02 million ton
Ranked 17th. 7 times more than Chile
699,000 ton
Ranked 31st.

Gross inland availability > Per capita 107.31 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 51st.
271.62 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Brazil

Net inland availability > Per capita 26.92 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 53th.
42.9 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 42nd. 59% more than Brazil

Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 17.21 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Chile
5.09 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 26th.

Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 79.67 ton
Ranked 43th.
228.06 ton
Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Brazil

Energy balance requirement per 1000 107.47 ton
Ranked 50th.
270.91 ton
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Brazil

Imports 13.7 million ton
Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Chile
4 million ton
Ranked 28th.

Imports per 1000 73.59 ton
Ranked 40th.
245.08 ton
Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Brazil

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.062
Ranked 41st.
0.155
Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Brazil

SOURCES: Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×