Energy > Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households	4.56 million ton Ranked 6th. 169 times more than Latvia	27,000 ton Ranked 89th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	35.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Latvia	11.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 82nd.
Consumption by households per 1000	35.68 ton Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Latvia	11.74 ton Ranked 77th.
Consumption by industry and construction	2.28 million ton Ranked 3rd. 1139 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 87th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	17.82 ton Ranked 9th. 20 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 74th.
Consumption by other consumers	600,000 ton Ranked 7th. 200 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 72nd.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	4.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 4 times more than Latvia	1.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	10.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th.	10.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 1% more than Japan
Consumption in road transport per 1000	10.34 ton Ranked 11th.	10.43 ton Ranked 10th. 1% more than Japan
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	29.8 ton Ranked 1st. 76 times more than Latvia	0.39 ton Ranked 14th.
Energy balance requirement per million	107,941.43 ton Ranked 3rd. 4 times more than Latvia	24,342.41 ton Ranked 41st.
Exports	5,000 ton Ranked 64th.	15,000 ton Ranked 56th. 3 times more than Japan
Gross inland availability per 1000	146.25 ton Ranked 11th. 6 times more than Latvia	24.34 ton Ranked 84th.
Imports per 1000	110.41 ton Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Latvia	30.86 ton Ranked 40th.
Net inland availability per 1000	68.73 ton Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Latvia	24.34 ton Ranked 78th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	11.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 67th.
Imports	14.11 million ton Ranked 1st. 199 times more than Latvia	71,000 ton Ranked 55th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	8.59 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 6th.	-1,271,725,307,333.61 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 57th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	1.41 million ton Ranked 1st. 1414 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 13th.
Energy balance requirement	13.79 million ton Ranked 1st. 246 times more than Latvia	56,000 ton Ranked 50th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	17.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 21 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 75th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.42 million ton Ranked 2nd. 712 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 84th.
Consumption in agriculture	25,000 ton Ranked 9th. 25 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 20th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	5.18 million ton Ranked 6th. 173 times more than Latvia	30,000 ton Ranked 99th.
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	10.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	10.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 1% more than Japan
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	10.34 ton Ranked 12th.	10.43 ton Ranked 11th. 1% more than Japan
Imports > Per capita	110.41 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Latvia	30.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	146.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 6 times more than Latvia	24.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 89th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	68.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Latvia	24.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	40.57 ton Ranked 37th. 3 times more than Latvia	13.04 ton Ranked 86th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	4.7 ton Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Latvia	1.3 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	0.196 ton Ranked 23th.	0.39 ton Ranked 12th. Twice as much as Japan
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	11.07 ton Ranked 1st. 28 times more than Latvia	0.39 ton Ranked 9th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	107,940.58 ton per 1 million people Ranked 3rd. 4 times more than Latvia	24,342.53 ton per 1 million people Ranked 43th.
Net inland availability	8.78 million ton Ranked 6th. 157 times more than Latvia	56,000 ton Ranked 95th.
Consumption by transportation industry	1.32 million ton Ranked 5th. 55 times more than Latvia	24,000 ton Ranked 31st.
Consumption in road transport	1.32 million ton Ranked 5th. 55 times more than Latvia	24,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.196 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.	0.387 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 97% more than Japan
Exports > Per capita	0.039 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 70th.	6.52 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th. 167 times more than Japan
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	11.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 29 times more than Latvia	0.387 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	40.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 3 times more than Latvia	13.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 90th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	29.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 77 times more than Latvia	0.387 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	3.81 million ton Ranked 1st. 3807 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 21st.
Gross inland availability	18.69 million ton Ranked 3rd. 334 times more than Latvia	56,000 ton Ranked 95th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	11.14 ton Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 67th.
Exports per 1000	0.0391 ton Ranked 67th.	6.52 ton Ranked 36th. 167 times more than Japan

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation