Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Australia & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Australia	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-1,715,000 ton Ranked 49th. 429 times more than Latvia	-4,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-84.362 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 49 times more than Latvia	-1.739 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	4.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.785 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Consumption by energy sector	1,000 ton Ranked 13th. The same as Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.057 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 8 times more than Australia
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.098 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.	15.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 160 times more than Australia
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	2.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.	32.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Australia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	89.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 6 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	89.24 ton Ranked 18th. 6 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton Ranked 54th.
Consumption by other consumers	49,000 ton Ranked 16th. 32% more than Latvia	37,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.41 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.	16.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 7 times more than Australia
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.63 million ton Ranked 20th. 47 times more than Latvia	35,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Energy balance requirement	35.83 million ton Ranked 15th. 299 times more than Latvia	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Exports	231.31 million ton Ranked 1st. 115656 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Exports per 1000	11,341.67 ton Ranked 1st. 13796 times more than Latvia	0.822 ton Ranked 31st.
Conversion to other forms of energy	33.96 million ton Ranked 14th. 3773 times more than Latvia	9,000 ton Ranked 67th.
Exports > Per capita	11,378.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 13944 times more than Latvia	0.816 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1,762.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 34 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Gross inland availability	35.83 million ton Ranked 15th. 299 times more than Latvia	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1,670.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 427 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.0981 ton Ranked 32nd.	15.65 ton Ranked 13th. 160 times more than Australia
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.4 ton Ranked 20th.	16.08 ton Ranked 7th. 7 times more than Australia
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	79.87 ton Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton Ranked 49th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	80.13 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	2.5 ton Ranked 31st.	32.6 ton Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Australia
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	5.1 ton Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Latvia	0.793 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	5.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Latvia	0.785 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Changes in stocks per million	-84,090.062 ton Ranked 50th. 48 times more than Latvia	-1,738.743 ton Ranked 36th.
Net inland availability per 1000	91.74 ton Ranked 20th. 92% more than Latvia	47.82 ton Ranked 38th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	1,665.08 ton Ranked 4th. 426 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton Ranked 63th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	1,756.82 ton Ranked 4th. 34 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	1,756.82 ton Ranked 4th. 34 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	104,000 ton Ranked 25th. 52 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	4.27 ton Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.793 ton Ranked 23th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.0572 ton Ranked 15th.	0.435 ton Ranked 9th. 8 times more than Australia
Consumption by chemical industry	87,000 ton Ranked 18th. 44 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households	2,000 ton Ranked 31st.	36,000 ton Ranked 21st. 18 times more than Australia
Consumption by households and other consumers	51,000 ton Ranked 28th.	75,000 ton Ranked 26th. 47% more than Australia
Consumption by industry and construction	1.82 million ton Ranked 24th. 52 times more than Latvia	35,000 ton Ranked 68th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	1.57 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 46th.	414.94 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 25th. 263955317644 times more than Australia
Net inland availability	1.87 million ton Ranked 23th. 17 times more than Latvia	110,000 ton Ranked 62nd.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	1,762.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 34 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	92.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 92% more than Latvia	47.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation