Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Burma & Malaysia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Burma	Malaysia	HISTORY
Bunkers	3,000 ton Ranked 73th.	22,180 ton Ranked 63th. 7 times more than Burma
Bunkers per 1000	0.0671 ton Ranked 70th.	0.858 ton Ranked 66th. 13 times more than Burma
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	-0.0448 ton Ranked 5th.	3.12 ton Ranked 2nd.
Changes in stocks per million	-121.023 ton Ranked 54th.	1,560.55 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by energy sector	1,000 ton Ranked 69th.	39,000 ton Ranked 49th. 39 times more than Burma
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 71st.	1.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th. 91 times more than Burma
Consumption by households and other consumers	5,000 ton Ranked 79th.	270,200 ton Ranked 17th. 54 times more than Burma
Consumption by industry and construction	73,000 ton Ranked 80th.	1.7 million ton Ranked 17th. 23 times more than Burma
Consumption by other consumers	4,000 ton Ranked 63th.	270,200 ton Ranked 11th. 68 times more than Burma
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.079 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th.	10.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 135 times more than Burma
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.45 ton Ranked 104th.	65.62 ton Ranked 17th. 45 times more than Burma
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 62nd.	1.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th. 91 times more than Burma
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.0199 ton Ranked 60th.	1.79 ton Ranked 49th. 90 times more than Burma
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.673 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 119th.	10.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 92nd. 16 times more than Burma
Imports per 1000	1.93 ton Ranked 113th.	67.96 ton Ranked 41st. 35 times more than Burma
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.0199 ton Ranked 69th.	1.79 ton Ranked 57th. 90 times more than Burma
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.678 ton Ranked 111th.	10.73 ton Ranked 82nd. 16 times more than Burma
Net inland availability per 1000	2.19 ton Ranked 121st.	76.23 ton Ranked 25th. 35 times more than Burma
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.678 ton Ranked 112th.	10.73 ton Ranked 85th. 16 times more than Burma
Changes in stocks at producers	-2,000 ton Ranked 6th.	63,000 ton Ranked 4th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	32,000 ton Ranked 24th. 52% more than Malaysia	21,000 ton Ranked 26th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	0.633 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th.	0.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 55% more than Burma
Conversion in thermal power plants	34,000 ton Ranked 104th.	277,260 ton Ranked 71st. 8 times more than Burma
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.673 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 118th.	10.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 89th. 16 times more than Burma
Conversion to other forms of energy	34,000 ton Ranked 107th.	277,260 ton Ranked 73th. 8 times more than Burma
Imports > Per capita	1.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 122nd.	69.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 48th. 36 times more than Burma
Imports	97,000 ton Ranked 83th.	1.76 million ton Ranked 16th. 18 times more than Burma
Net inland availability > Per capita	2.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 129th.	77.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 36 times more than Burma
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	0.633 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Malaysia	0.159 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	0.638 ton Ranked 28th.	0.963 ton Ranked 26th. 51% more than Burma
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0797 ton Ranked 73th.	10.46 ton Ranked 14th. 131 times more than Burma
Consumption by transportation industry	32,000 ton Ranked 30th. 8 times more than Malaysia	4,030 ton Ranked 41st.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	0.638 ton Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Malaysia	0.156 ton Ranked 41st.
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-0.046 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	3.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.
Changes in stocks	-6,000 ton Ranked 58th.	40,330 ton Ranked 18th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.121 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.	1.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.099 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 90th.	10.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th. 108 times more than Burma
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 110th.	66.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 46 times more than Burma
Consumption by petroleum refineries	1,000 ton Ranked 62nd.	39,000 ton Ranked 43th. 39 times more than Burma
Consumption by other industries and construction	73,000 ton Ranked 78th.	1.7 million ton Ranked 15th. 23 times more than Burma
Bunkers > Per capita	0.069 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 72nd.	0.875 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 71st. 13 times more than Burma
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 109th.	66.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 46 times more than Burma
Net inland availability	110,000 ton Ranked 79th.	1.97 million ton Ranked 17th. 18 times more than Burma
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.0996 ton Ranked 85th.	10.46 ton Ranked 18th. 105 times more than Burma
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.45 ton Ranked 105th.	65.62 ton Ranked 19th. 45 times more than Burma

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation