Energy > Coke Oven Coke Stats: compare key data on Canada & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-122,000 ton Ranked 37th.	1,000 ton Ranked 23th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	26.12 ton Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	327,000 ton Ranked 7th. 327 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.433 ton Ranked 15th.	1.27 ton Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Canada
Energy balance requirement	56,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 8 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	1.73 ton Ranked 36th.	3.04 ton Ranked 30th. 76% more than Canada
Exports	154,000 ton Ranked 13th. 154 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Exports > Per capita	4.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 11 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Gross inland availability	3.36 million ton Ranked 16th. 480 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 56th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	104.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 34 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	104.02 ton Ranked 19th. 34 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 46th.
Imports	88,000 ton Ranked 30th. 11 times more than Latvia	8,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Imports > Per capita	2.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.	3.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 28% more than Canada
Imports per 1000	2.72 ton Ranked 35th.	3.48 ton Ranked 32nd. 28% more than Canada
Net inland availability > Per capita	36.26 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	10.12 ton Ranked 5th. 24 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	14,000 ton Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 75% more than Canada
Changes in stocks per million	-3,775.687 ton Ranked 35th.	434.69 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	10.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 24 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.433 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.	1.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Canada
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	36.24 ton Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	844,000 ton Ranked 12th. 121 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	26.13 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	36.26 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by industry and construction	1.17 million ton Ranked 11th. 167 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-11,826,991,547,725.9 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 18th. 28 times more than Latvia	-427,715,996,578.271 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 16th.
Net inland availability	1.17 million ton Ranked 12th. 167 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	36.24 ton Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 39th.
Exports per 1000	4.77 ton Ranked 14th. 11 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton Ranked 25th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation