Energy > Motor Gasoline Stats: compare key data on Canada & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	1.03 million ton Ranked 3rd. 207 times more than Latvia	5,000 ton Ranked 50th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	36.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 17 times more than Latvia	2.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.
Consumption by transportation industry	29.75 million ton Ranked 3rd. 89 times more than Latvia	335,000 ton Ranked 92nd.
Consumption in road transport	29.75 million ton Ranked 3rd. 89 times more than Latvia	335,000 ton Ranked 92nd.
Consumption in road transport per 1000	920.74 ton Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Latvia	145.62 ton Ranked 69th.
Exports	6.87 million ton Ranked 4th. 102 times more than Latvia	67,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Exports per 1000	212.46 ton Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Latvia	29.12 ton Ranked 40th.
Gross inland availability	29.07 million ton Ranked 4th. 86 times more than Latvia	338,000 ton Ranked 90th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	899.82 ton Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Latvia	146.92 ton Ranked 71st.
Imports > Per capita	113.13 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.	179.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st. 59% more than Canada
Imports per 1000	113.08 ton Ranked 46th.	179.53 ton Ranked 30th. 59% more than Canada
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement	-3,195,000 ton Ranked 190th.	338,000 ton Ranked 27th.
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement > Per capita	-98,919.471 ton per 1 million people Ranked 178th.	146,924.58 ton per 1 million people Ranked 44th.
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement per 1000	-98.88 ton Ranked 163th.	146.92 ton Ranked 35th.
Net inland availability per 1000	920.74 ton Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Latvia	148.66 ton Ranked 68th.
Exports > Per capita	212.54 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 7 times more than Latvia	29.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.
Imports	3.65 million ton Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Latvia	413,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	900.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Latvia	146.93 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th.
Net inland availability	29.75 million ton Ranked 4th. 87 times more than Latvia	342,000 ton Ranked 91st.
Net inland availability > Per capita	921.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 6 times more than Latvia	148.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 81st.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	36.67 ton Ranked 2nd. 17 times more than Latvia	2.17 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	36.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 84 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Consumption in agriculture	1.03 million ton Ranked 3rd. 1033 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	921.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Latvia	145.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 82nd.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,414,935,446,917.86 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 47th. 39% more than Latvia	-1,738,752,445,120.62 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 44th.
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	921.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Latvia	145.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	920.74 ton Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Latvia	145.62 ton Ranked 70th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	36.67 ton Ranked 1st. 84 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 24th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation