Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Chile & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Chile	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	2.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.	-0.051 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	58,000 ton Ranked 52nd. 10 times more than Poland	6,000 ton Ranked 119th.
Consumption by industry and construction	22,000 ton Ranked 18th. 22 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.35 ton Ranked 18th. 51 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 57th.
Consumption by other consumers	2,000 ton Ranked 50th.	6,000 ton Ranked 37th. 3 times more than Chile
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.122 ton Ranked 52nd.	0.157 ton Ranked 50th. 28% more than Chile
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	0.859 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Poland	0.052 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Energy balance requirement	6,000 ton Ranked 80th.	-17,000 ton Ranked 129th.
Energy balance requirement per million	367.25 ton Ranked 94th.	-445.429 ton Ranked 117th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	5.81 ton Ranked 77th. 222 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 158th.
Imports	1,000 ton Ranked 111th.	15,000 ton Ranked 58th. 15 times more than Chile
Imports > Per capita	0.062 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 122nd.	0.392 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 97th. 6 times more than Chile
Net inland availability per 1000	5.75 ton Ranked 70th. 220 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 152nd.
Production from refineries per 1000	5.45 ton Ranked 39th. 12 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Total > Production per 1000	5.45 ton Ranked 39th. 12 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	3.56 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 93th. 23 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 154th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 52 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.123 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 53th. 28% more than Chile
Consumption by transportation industry	14,000 ton Ranked 4th. 7 times more than Poland	2,000 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	0.859 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 33 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Production from refineries > Per capita	5.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st. 12 times more than Poland	0.445 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Production from refineries	89,000 ton Ranked 46th. 5 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	0.857 ton Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Poland	0.0518 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.35 ton Ranked 17th. 51 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 56th.
Imports per 1000	0.0618 ton Ranked 114th.	0.392 ton Ranked 99th. 6 times more than Chile
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	2.01 ton Ranked 8th.	-0.0525 ton Ranked 25th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	61.37 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 24th.	-26,201,708,613.418 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 30th.
Total > Production	89,000 ton Ranked 46th. 5 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Net inland availability > Per capita	5.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 77th. 222 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 162nd.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	368.21 ton per million people Ranked 102nd.	-445.428 ton per million people Ranked 125th.
Consumption in road transport	14,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 14 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-368.208 ton per million people Ranked 35th. 7 times more than Poland	-52.379 ton per million people Ranked 22nd.
Net inland availability	94,000 ton Ranked 41st. 94 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 152nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	3.55 ton Ranked 84th. 23 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 144th.
Changes in stocks at producers	28,000 ton Ranked 6th.	-2,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 52 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	22,000 ton Ranked 17th. 22 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 49th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	5.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 84th. 224 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 169th.
Gross inland availability	95,000 ton Ranked 44th. 95 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 158th.
Consumption in road transport per 1000	0.857 ton Ranked 1st. 33 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 7th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation