Energy > Petroleum Coke Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Japan

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Japan	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	27,000 ton Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Japan	5,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Changes in stocks per million	4,982.07 ton Ranked 4th. 127 times more than Japan	39.13 ton Ranked 16th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	46.87 ton Ranked 7th. 85% more than Japan	25.37 ton Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	46.87 ton Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Japan	15.17 ton Ranked 15th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	5.54 ton Ranked 2nd.	8.82 ton Ranked 3rd. 59% more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	5.54 ton Ranked 5th.	12.76 ton Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement per 1000	46.13 ton Ranked 13th. 31% more than Japan	35.16 ton Ranked 16th.
Exports	20,000 ton Ranked 19th.	86,000 ton Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Denmark
Exports per 1000	3.69 ton Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Japan	0.673 ton Ranked 18th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	46.13 ton Ranked 18th. 11% more than Japan	41.53 ton Ranked 21st.
Imports	297,000 ton Ranked 17th.	4.58 million ton Ranked 1st. 15 times more than Denmark
Imports > Per capita	54.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 53% more than Japan	35.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th.
Imports per 1000	54.8 ton Ranked 12th. 53% more than Japan	35.87 ton Ranked 17th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	47.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 88% more than Japan	25.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-1,477,110,874,527.19 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Japan	-266,094,823,673.047 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 18th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	46.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 85% more than Japan	25.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	254,000 ton Ranked 14th.	1.94 million ton Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction	254,000 ton Ranked 14th.	3.24 million ton Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy	29,000 ton Ranked 8th.	1.63 million ton Ranked 2nd. 56 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	46.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Japan	15.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.	8.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 59% more than Denmark
Conversion in thermal power plants	29,000 ton Ranked 5th.	1.13 million ton Ranked 2nd. 39 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	12.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement	250,000 ton Ranked 15th.	4.49 million ton Ranked 1st. 18 times more than Denmark
Exports > Per capita	3.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Japan	0.673 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	46.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 11% more than Japan	41.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Gross inland availability	250,000 ton Ranked 28th.	5.31 million ton Ranked 4th. 21 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	46,159.71 ton per 1 million people Ranked 13th. 31% more than Japan	35,155.82 ton per 1 million people Ranked 16th.
Net inland availability	258,000 ton Ranked 14th.	3.24 million ton Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability per 1000	47.61 ton Ranked 7th. 88% more than Japan	25.37 ton Ranked 12th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation