Energy > Coke Oven Coke Stats: compare key data on Germany & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Germany	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-94,000 ton Ranked 35th.	1,000 ton Ranked 23th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	15.76 ton Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	412,000 ton Ranked 5th. 412 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.655 ton Ranked 14th.	1.27 ton Ranked 10th. 95% more than Germany
Energy balance requirement	3.81 million ton Ranked 1st. 545 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	46.22 ton Ranked 6th. 15 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 30th.
Exports	75,000 ton Ranked 17th. 75 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Exports > Per capita	0.909 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th. 2 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Gross inland availability	12.21 million ton Ranked 7th. 1744 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 56th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	148.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 49 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	148.04 ton Ranked 13th. 49 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 46th.
Imports	3.79 million ton Ranked 1st. 474 times more than Latvia	8,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Imports > Per capita	45.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 13 times more than Latvia	3.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.
Imports per 1000	45.99 ton Ranked 8th. 13 times more than Latvia	3.48 ton Ranked 32nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	21.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 7 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5 ton Ranked 14th. 12 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	54,000 ton Ranked 10th. 18 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	46.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 15 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Changes in stocks per million	-1,139.816 ton Ranked 28th.	434.69 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 12 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.655 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.	1.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 94% more than Germany
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	20.76 ton Ranked 19th. 7 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	1.3 million ton Ranked 9th. 186 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	15.76 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 5 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	20.76 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 7 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by industry and construction	1.71 million ton Ranked 9th. 245 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Statistical differences > Per capita	521.41 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 6th.	-427,715,996,578.271 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 16th.
Net inland availability	1.78 million ton Ranked 9th. 254 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	21.55 ton Ranked 19th. 7 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 39th.
Exports per 1000	0.909 ton Ranked 23th. 2 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton Ranked 25th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation