Energy > Petroleum Coke Stats: compare key data on Israel & Sweden

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Israel	Sweden	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-24,000 ton Ranked 19th.	13,000 ton Ranked 8th.
Changes in stocks per million	-3,918.367 ton Ranked 21st.	1,439.71 ton Ranked 8th.
Consumption by industry and construction	312,000 ton Ranked 8th. 78 times more than Sweden	4,000 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	50.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 112 times more than Sweden	0.456 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	50.94 ton Ranked 3rd. 112 times more than Sweden	0.456 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	312,000 ton Ranked 8th. 78 times more than Sweden	4,000 ton Ranked 20th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	50.94 ton Ranked 3rd. 112 times more than Sweden	0.456 ton Ranked 17th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	90.19 ton Ranked 3rd. 15 times more than Sweden	5.84 ton Ranked 7th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	90.19 ton Ranked 4th. 22 times more than Sweden	4.1 ton Ranked 33th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	90.19 ton Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Sweden	10.3 ton Ranked 38th.
Imports	625,000 ton Ranked 12th. 13 times more than Sweden	50,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Imports > Per capita	90.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 16 times more than Sweden	5.54 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Imports per 1000	90.19 ton Ranked 4th. 16 times more than Sweden	5.54 ton Ranked 34th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	50.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 112 times more than Sweden	0.456 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,385,116,870,726.67 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 17th. 21 times more than Sweden	-111,656,989,727.556 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 16th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	90.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 15 times more than Sweden	5.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	625,000 ton Ranked 10th. 13 times more than Sweden	50,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	50.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 112 times more than Sweden	0.456 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th.
Energy balance requirement	625,000 ton Ranked 9th. 17 times more than Sweden	37,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	90.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Sweden	10.31 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Gross inland availability	625,000 ton Ranked 20th. 7 times more than Sweden	93,000 ton Ranked 44th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	90,270.96 ton per 1 million people Ranked 4th. 22 times more than Sweden	4,100.16 ton per 1 million people Ranked 33th.
Net inland availability	312,000 ton Ranked 8th. 78 times more than Sweden	4,000 ton Ranked 21st.
Net inland availability per 1000	50.94 ton Ranked 3rd. 112 times more than Sweden	0.456 ton Ranked 18th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation