Energy > Coke Oven Coke Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	552,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 552 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 23th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	24 ton Ranked 15th. 8 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.63 million ton Ranked 2nd. 1634 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	3.52 ton Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.27 ton Ranked 10th.
Energy balance requirement	483,000 ton Ranked 14th. 69 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	3.78 ton Ranked 29th. 24% more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 30th.
Exports	1.67 million ton Ranked 4th. 1674 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Exports > Per capita	13.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 31 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Gross inland availability	44.4 million ton Ranked 2nd. 6343 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 56th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	347.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 114 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	347.48 ton Ranked 4th. 114 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 46th.
Imports	2.71 million ton Ranked 3rd. 339 times more than Latvia	8,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Imports > Per capita	21.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Latvia	3.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.
Imports per 1000	21.2 ton Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Latvia	3.48 ton Ranked 32nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	38.5 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 13 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	12.79 ton Ranked 2nd. 30 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	450,000 ton Ranked 5th. 150 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	3.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 24% more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Changes in stocks per million	4,320.16 ton Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Latvia	434.69 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	12.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 30 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	3.52 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	37.86 ton Ranked 11th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	3.07 million ton Ranked 5th. 438 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	24 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 8 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	37.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by industry and construction	4.84 million ton Ranked 4th. 691 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Statistical differences > Per capita	4.62 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 3rd.	-427,715,996,578.271 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 16th.
Net inland availability	4.92 million ton Ranked 4th. 703 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	38.5 ton Ranked 12th. 13 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 39th.
Exports per 1000	13.1 ton Ranked 9th. 31 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton Ranked 25th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation