Energy > Coke Oven Coke Stats: compare key data on Latvia & Russia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Latvia	Russia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	1,000 ton Ranked 23th.	46,000 ton Ranked 14th. 46 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 33th.	24.4 ton Ranked 14th. 8 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 38th.	823,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 823 times more than Latvia
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	1.27 ton Ranked 10th.	3.54 ton Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement	7,000 ton Ranked 41st.	-2,774,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 30th.	-19.378 ton Ranked 59th.
Exports	1,000 ton Ranked 32nd.	2.88 million ton Ranked 3rd. 2881 times more than Latvia
Exports > Per capita	0.428 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	20.13 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 47 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability	7,000 ton Ranked 56th.	27.22 million ton Ranked 3rd. 3889 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.	190.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 63 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 46th.	190.18 ton Ranked 11th. 63 times more than Latvia
Imports	8,000 ton Ranked 47th.	153,000 ton Ranked 24th. 19 times more than Latvia
Imports > Per capita	3.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Russia	1.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.
Imports per 1000	3.48 ton Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Russia	1.07 ton Ranked 40th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.	30.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 10 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.43 ton Ranked 34th.	5.75 ton Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Latvia
Consumption for non-energy uses	3,000 ton Ranked 14th.	507,000 ton Ranked 4th. 169 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.	-19.383 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 60th.
Changes in stocks per million	434.69 ton Ranked 19th. 35% more than Russia	321.34 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.	5.75 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Latvia
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	1.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.	3.54 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 38th.	30.22 ton Ranked 15th. 10 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry	7,000 ton Ranked 47th.	3.49 million ton Ranked 4th. 499 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.	24.41 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 8 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.	30.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 10 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.	4.33 million ton Ranked 5th. 618 times more than Latvia
Statistical differences > Per capita	-427,715,996,578.271 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 16th.	-2,502,613,841,122.95 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 17th. 6 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.	4.34 million ton Ranked 5th. 619 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 39th.	30.29 ton Ranked 16th. 10 times more than Latvia
Exports per 1000	0.428 ton Ranked 25th.	20.13 ton Ranked 6th. 47 times more than Latvia

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation