Energy > Other Petroleum Products Stats: compare key data on Netherlands & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Netherlands	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks per million	796.58 ton Ranked 9th. 30 times more than Poland	26.2 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	30.45 ton Ranked 3rd. 116 times more than Poland	0.262 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by industry and construction	73,000 ton Ranked 7th. 18 times more than Poland	4,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	4.48 ton Ranked 10th. 43 times more than Poland	0.105 ton Ranked 22nd.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	160.85 ton Ranked 2nd. 30 times more than Poland	5.29 ton Ranked 44th.
Energy balance requirement per million	57,353.41 ton Ranked 4th.	-655.043 ton Ranked 54th.
Exports per 1000	192.53 ton Ranked 2nd. 47 times more than Poland	4.11 ton Ranked 22nd.
Gross inland availability per 1000	375.49 ton Ranked 2nd. 41 times more than Poland	9.12 ton Ranked 46th.
Imports	4.09 million ton Ranked 2nd. 31 times more than Poland	133,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Imports per 1000	250.68 ton Ranked 1st. 72 times more than Poland	3.48 ton Ranked 31st.
Net inland availability per 1000	4.48 ton Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Poland	1.41 ton Ranked 20th.
Net transfers per 1000	169.79 ton Ranked 2nd. 6494 times more than Poland	0.0261 ton Ranked 11th.
Production from refineries per 1000	318.14 ton Ranked 3rd. 33 times more than Poland	9.77 ton Ranked 44th.
Total > Production per 1000	318.14 ton Ranked 3rd. 33 times more than Poland	9.77 ton Ranked 44th.
Transfers out per 1000	169.79 ton Ranked 2nd. 6494 times more than Poland	0.0261 ton Ranked 11th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	30.45 ton Ranked 2nd. 145 times more than Poland	0.21 ton Ranked 16th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	30.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 116 times more than Poland	0.262 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Changes in stocks	13,000 ton Ranked 7th. 13 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by energy sector	497,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 50 times more than Poland	10,000 ton Ranked 17th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	4.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 43 times more than Poland	0.105 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by other industries and construction	73,000 ton Ranked 6th. 18 times more than Poland	4,000 ton Ranked 17th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	4.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 43 times more than Poland	0.105 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	160.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 30 times more than Poland	5.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	7.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Poland	0.838 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	2.62 million ton Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than Poland	202,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	128,000 ton Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Poland	32,000 ton Ranked 10th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	57.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	-0.655 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th.
Energy balance requirement	936,000 ton Ranked 3rd.	-25,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Exports	3.14 million ton Ranked 1st. 20 times more than Poland	157,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Exports > Per capita	192.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 47 times more than Poland	4.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Gross inland availability	6.13 million ton Ranked 4th. 18 times more than Poland	348,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	375.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 41 times more than Poland	9.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 49th.
Net transfers > Per capita	169.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 6531 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	4.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 3 times more than Poland	1.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.
Net inland availability	73,000 ton Ranked 12th. 35% more than Poland	54,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Net transfers	2.77 million ton Ranked 3rd. 2771 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Imports > Per capita	250.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 72 times more than Poland	3.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	6.56 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Poland	1.31 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 8th.
Production from refineries	5.19 million ton Ranked 4th. 14 times more than Poland	373,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Production from refineries > Per capita	318.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 33 times more than Poland	9.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.
Total > Production	5.19 million ton Ranked 4th. 14 times more than Poland	373,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Transfers out > Per capita	169.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 6531 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Transfers out	2.77 million ton Ranked 3rd. 2771 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	7.84 ton Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Poland	0.838 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	30.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 145 times more than Poland	0.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries	497,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 62 times more than Poland	8,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	4.48 ton Ranked 11th. 43 times more than Poland	0.105 ton Ranked 23th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation