Energy > Coke Oven Coke Stats: compare key data on Austria & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Austria	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-42,000 ton Ranked 33th.	1,000 ton Ranked 23th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	34.52 ton Ranked 10th. 11 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	18,000 ton Ranked 28th. 18 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	1.82 ton Ranked 10th. 43% more than Latvia	1.27 ton Ranked 10th.
Energy balance requirement	1.43 million ton Ranked 5th. 204 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	173.31 ton Ranked 1st. 57 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 30th.
Exports	18,000 ton Ranked 25th. 18 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Exports > Per capita	2.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Gross inland availability	2.86 million ton Ranked 19th. 409 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 56th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	347.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 114 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	347.97 ton Ranked 3rd. 114 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 46th.
Imports	1.4 million ton Ranked 6th. 175 times more than Latvia	8,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Imports > Per capita	170.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 49 times more than Latvia	3.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.
Imports per 1000	170.4 ton Ranked 1st. 49 times more than Latvia	3.48 ton Ranked 32nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	57.94 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 19 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	2.19 ton Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	15,000 ton Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	173.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 57 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Changes in stocks per million	-5,104.627 ton Ranked 36th.	434.69 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	2.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	1.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 43% more than Latvia	1.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	37.8 ton Ranked 12th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	284,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 41 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	34.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 11 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	37.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 12 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by industry and construction	311,000 ton Ranked 24th. 44 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Statistical differences > Per capita	2.76 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 9th.	-427,715,996,578.271 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 16th.
Net inland availability	477,000 ton Ranked 18th. 68 times more than Latvia	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	57.97 ton Ranked 6th. 19 times more than Latvia	3.04 ton Ranked 39th.
Exports per 1000	2.19 ton Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.428 ton Ranked 25th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation