Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Canada & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households	117,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 39 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 101st.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	2.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	2.14 ton Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	69,000 ton Ranked 9th. 69 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 54th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.155 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	0.401 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Canada
Energy balance requirement	-152,000 ton Ranked 139th.	2,000 ton Ranked 102nd.
Exports > Per capita	3.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Latvia	1.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Gross inland availability	1.47 million ton Ranked 10th. 737 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 151st.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 52 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 140th.
Imports	28,000 ton Ranked 46th. 14 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 100th.
Imports > Per capita	0.867 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 100th.	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th. About the same as Canada
Net transfers	1.16 million ton Ranked 2nd. 581 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Net transfers > Per capita	35.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 41 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-61,921,421,715.842 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 33th.	2.95 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 14th.
Transfers out > Per capita	35.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 41 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	3.81 ton Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton Ranked 38th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	45.59 ton Ranked 16th. 52 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 129th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	245,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 123 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 140th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	3.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 96th.
Consumption by industry and construction	69,000 ton Ranked 11th. 69 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption by other consumers	123,000 ton Ranked 9th. 62 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	7.58 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st. 9 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 125th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	2.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	3.81 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Transfers out	1.16 million ton Ranked 2nd. 581 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Transfers out per 1000	35.93 ton Ranked 3rd. 41 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 7th.
Exports	108,000 ton Ranked 17th. 27 times more than Latvia	4,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption in agriculture	5,000 ton Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	2.14 ton Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 36th.
Imports per 1000	0.867 ton Ranked 92nd.	0.869 ton Ranked 91st. About the same as Canada
Exports per 1000	3.34 ton Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Latvia	1.59 ton Ranked 22nd.
Net transfers per 1000	35.93 ton Ranked 3rd. 41 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 7th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	9.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th. 23 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 142nd.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-4,706.027 ton per million people Ranked 134th.	869.38 ton per million people Ranked 93th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	2,229.17 ton per million people Ranked 6th.	-773.394 ton per million people Ranked 37th.
Net inland availability	314,000 ton Ranked 19th. 314 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 157th.
Consumption by households per 1000	3.62 ton Ranked 70th. 3 times more than Latvia	1.19 ton Ranked 95th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	7.58 ton Ranked 53th. 9 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton Ranked 123th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	0.155 ton Ranked 11th.	0.407 ton Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Canada
Energy balance requirement per million	-4,704.135 ton Ranked 126th.	869.37 ton Ranked 85th.
Net inland availability per 1000	9.72 ton Ranked 49th. 23 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 141st.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation