Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Cuba

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Brazil	Cuba	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	238,000 ton Ranked 21st. 17 times more than Cuba	14,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	1.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 66th. 3% more than Cuba	1.24 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 67th.
Consumption by industry and construction	4.37 million ton Ranked 10th. 39 times more than Cuba	113,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	23.48 ton Ranked 58th. 2 times more than Cuba	10.01 ton Ranked 79th.
Consumption in agriculture	63,000 ton Ranked 11th. 32 times more than Cuba	2,000 ton Ranked 42nd.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.338 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 91% more than Cuba	0.177 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	798,000 ton Ranked 5th. 9 times more than Cuba	90,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	4.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.	8.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 94% more than Brazil
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	0.258 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd.	0.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 47% more than Brazil
Conversion in thermal power plants	690,000 ton Ranked 45th.	2.61 million ton Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Brazil
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	3.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 104th.	231.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 63 times more than Brazil
Conversion to other forms of energy	690,000 ton Ranked 47th.	2.61 million ton Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Brazil
Imports	50,000 ton Ranked 97th.	1.93 million ton Ranked 14th. 39 times more than Brazil
Imports > Per capita	0.268 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 138th.	171.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 640 times more than Brazil
Net inland availability > Per capita	29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 65th. 3 times more than Cuba	11.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 94th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	4.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	8.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 94% more than Brazil
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	1.28 ton Ranked 61st. 3% more than Cuba	1.24 ton Ranked 62nd.
Bunkers	2.87 million ton Ranked 10th. 50 times more than Cuba	58,000 ton Ranked 56th.
Consumption by energy sector	1.11 million ton Ranked 12th. 65 times more than Cuba	17,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.93 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th. 4 times more than Cuba	1.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th.
Consumption by other consumers	175,000 ton Ranked 15th. 15 times more than Cuba	12,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.939 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 54th.	1.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 53th. 13% more than Brazil
Bunkers per 1000	15.44 ton Ranked 43th. 3 times more than Cuba	5.14 ton Ranked 56th.
Changes in stocks per million	-628.551 ton Ranked 47th.	1,330.57 ton Ranked 28th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	19.38 ton Ranked 55th. 94% more than Cuba	10.01 ton Ranked 71st.
Imports per 1000	0.269 ton Ranked 129th.	171.27 ton Ranked 26th. 638 times more than Brazil
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.94 ton Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Cuba	1.51 ton Ranked 54th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	3.71 ton Ranked 97th.	231.22 ton Ranked 13th. 62 times more than Brazil
Net inland availability per 1000	29.04 ton Ranked 59th. 3 times more than Cuba	11.25 ton Ranked 86th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	0.338 ton Ranked 33th. 91% more than Cuba	0.177 ton Ranked 36th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	3.71 ton Ranked 99th.	231.22 ton Ranked 13th. 62 times more than Brazil
Changes in stocks	-117,000 ton Ranked 68th.	15,000 ton Ranked 31st.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.628 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.	1.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	23.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st. 2 times more than Cuba	10.03 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	3.61 million ton Ranked 8th. 32 times more than Cuba	113,000 ton Ranked 68th.
Bunkers > Per capita	15.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th. 3 times more than Cuba	5.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	19.36 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 60th. 93% more than Cuba	10.03 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 75th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	4.29 ton Ranked 19th.	8.27 ton Ranked 16th. 93% more than Brazil
Net inland availability	5.41 million ton Ranked 8th. 43 times more than Cuba	127,000 ton Ranked 75th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.94 ton Ranked 50th.	1.06 ton Ranked 48th. 13% more than Brazil
Consumption by transportation industry	798,000 ton Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Cuba	90,000 ton Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	4.29 ton Ranked 23th.	8.27 ton Ranked 19th. 93% more than Brazil
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	3.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 106th.	231.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 63 times more than Brazil

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation