Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-358,000 ton Ranked 48th. 90 times more than Latvia	-4,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-66.101 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 49th. 38 times more than Latvia	-1.739 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.88 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.785 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.186 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.	15.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 84 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	12.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.	32.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	50.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	50.74 ton Ranked 29th. 3 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton Ranked 54th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	254,000 ton Ranked 38th. 7 times more than Latvia	35,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.369 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 11 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy	5.91 million ton Ranked 26th. 656 times more than Latvia	9,000 ton Ranked 67th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1,090.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 279 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1,150.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 22 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Exports	96,000 ton Ranked 24th. 48 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Exports > Per capita	17.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 22 times more than Latvia	0.816 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.
Gross inland availability	6.23 million ton Ranked 31st. 52 times more than Latvia	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.186 ton Ranked 33th.	15.65 ton Ranked 13th. 84 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.378 ton Ranked 28th.	16.08 ton Ranked 7th. 43 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	46.87 ton Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton Ranked 49th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	46.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	12.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	12.36 ton Ranked 20th.	32.6 ton Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement	6.23 million ton Ranked 31st. 52 times more than Latvia	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Changes in stocks per million	-66,058.583 ton Ranked 48th. 38 times more than Latvia	-1,738.743 ton Ranked 36th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	1,090.15 ton Ranked 11th. 279 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton Ranked 63th.
Exports per 1000	17.71 ton Ranked 20th. 22 times more than Latvia	0.822 ton Ranked 31st.
Gross inland availability per 1000	1,150.12 ton Ranked 13th. 22 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption in agriculture	67,000 ton Ranked 7th. 34 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.378 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	16.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 43 times more than Denmark
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	2,000 ton Ranked 22nd.	9,000 ton Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Denmark
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	12.36 ton Ranked 5th. 14 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.87 ton Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.793 ton Ranked 23th.
Imports per 1000	1,101.78 ton Ranked 7th. 22 times more than Latvia	50.42 ton Ranked 44th.
Consumption by chemical industry	21,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 11 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households	1,000 ton Ranked 38th.	36,000 ton Ranked 21st. 36 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households and other consumers	67,000 ton Ranked 27th.	75,000 ton Ranked 26th. 12% more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction	275,000 ton Ranked 44th. 8 times more than Latvia	35,000 ton Ranked 68th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-3,138,860,608,370.27 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 36th.	414.94 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 25th.
Imports > Per capita	1,102.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 22 times more than Latvia	50.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.
Net inland availability	342,000 ton Ranked 43th. 3 times more than Latvia	110,000 ton Ranked 62nd.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	1,150.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 22 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	63.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 32% more than Latvia	47.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by other consumers	2,000 ton Ranked 34th.	37,000 ton Ranked 18th. 19 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability per 1000	63.11 ton Ranked 28th. 32% more than Latvia	47.82 ton Ranked 38th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.369 ton Ranked 20th.	3.91 ton Ranked 13th. 11 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement per 1000	1,150.12 ton Ranked 13th. 22 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.
Imports	5.97 million ton Ranked 22nd. 51 times more than Latvia	116,000 ton Ranked 62nd.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation