Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	112,000 ton Ranked 13th.	-4,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	0.883 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.	-1.739 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	38.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 50 times more than Latvia	0.785 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Consumption by energy sector	104,000 ton Ranked 7th. 104 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.814 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 87% more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.048 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.	15.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 326 times more than Japan
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	7.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	32.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Japan
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	7.36 ton Ranked 24th.	32.6 ton Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Japan
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	130.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 9 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	130.33 ton Ranked 12th. 9 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton Ranked 54th.
Consumption by other consumers	941,000 ton Ranked 7th. 25 times more than Latvia	37,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	8.56 million ton Ranked 8th. 245 times more than Latvia	35,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per 1000	0.814 ton Ranked 5th. 87% more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 6th.
Exports	3,000 ton Ranked 38th. 50% more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Net inland availability per 1000	137.7 ton Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Latvia	47.82 ton Ranked 38th.
Exports per 1000	0.0235 ton Ranked 41st.	0.822 ton Ranked 31st. 35 times more than Japan
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	7.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.	16.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Japan
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	25,000 ton Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Latvia	9,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Imports	174.71 million ton Ranked 1st. 1506 times more than Latvia	116,000 ton Ranked 62nd.
Changes in stocks at importers per million	-259.032 ton Ranked 10th.	-29,259.272 ton Ranked 13th. 113 times more than Japan
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.196 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 20 times more than Japan
Conversion to other forms of energy	159.03 million ton Ranked 4th. 17669 times more than Latvia	9,000 ton Ranked 67th.
Exports > Per capita	0.023 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.	0.816 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 35 times more than Japan
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1,367.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 26 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Gross inland availability	174.71 million ton Ranked 5th. 1456 times more than Latvia	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1,244.58 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 318 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.0477 ton Ranked 36th.	15.65 ton Ranked 13th. 328 times more than Japan
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	7.36 ton Ranked 14th.	16.08 ton Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Japan
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	66.99 ton Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton Ranked 49th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries > Per capita	0.814 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 87% more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	104,000 ton Ranked 5th. 104 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	66.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Latvia	15.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	24.48 ton Ranked 11th. 31 times more than Latvia	0.793 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	24.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 31 times more than Latvia	0.785 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Energy balance requirement	174.71 million ton Ranked 5th. 1456 times more than Latvia	120,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Changes in stocks per million	882.79 ton Ranked 21st.	-1,738.743 ton Ranked 36th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.196 ton Ranked 21st.	3.91 ton Ranked 13th. 20 times more than Japan
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	1,244.59 ton Ranked 9th. 318 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton Ranked 63th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	1,367.35 ton Ranked 10th. 26 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	1,367.35 ton Ranked 10th. 26 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	3.13 million ton Ranked 5th. 1564 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	38.87 ton Ranked 3rd. 49 times more than Latvia	0.793 ton Ranked 23th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.814 ton Ranked 8th. 87% more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 9th.
Imports per 1000	1,367.37 ton Ranked 4th. 27 times more than Latvia	50.42 ton Ranked 44th.
Changes in stocks at importers	-32,000 ton Ranked 13th.	-75,000 ton Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Japan
Changes in stocks at importers > Per capita	-0.259 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.	-29.002 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 112 times more than Japan
Consumption by chemical industry	4.97 million ton Ranked 3rd. 2483 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households	6,000 ton Ranked 28th.	36,000 ton Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Japan
Consumption by households and other consumers	941,000 ton Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Latvia	75,000 ton Ranked 26th.
Consumption by industry and construction	16.65 million ton Ranked 4th. 476 times more than Latvia	35,000 ton Ranked 68th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-15,754,378,825,113.1 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 39th.	414.94 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 25th.
Imports > Per capita	1,367.36 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 27 times more than Latvia	50.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.
Net inland availability	17.59 million ton Ranked 6th. 160 times more than Latvia	110,000 ton Ranked 62nd.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	1,367.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 26 times more than Latvia	52.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	137.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Latvia	47.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation